Re: "Equality" for can't-cope-won't-cope feminist wusses

In article <1135869762.783199.163150@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ,
"Hyerdahl" <Hyerdahl3@xxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> Rob wrote:
>> The Times December 29, 2005
>>
>> We've gone from being Amazons to can't cope, won't cope wusses
>> Carol Sarler
>> http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,1072-1961661,00.html
>> (edit)
>
>>
>> Of course feminists never were can-cope Amazons, they were only ever
>> little girls crying to daddy about how life isn't fair; about how they
>> want to be strong, brave and heroic like their brothers.
>>
>> Until it came to actually being equal. Until they smelt the garbage,
>> felt the weight of the brick hod or experienced the claustrophobia of
>> years working in the mine.
>>
>> And still they have no idea of the sheer disposability that most men
>> take for granted.
>
> Poor little Carol Sarler has bought into the notion that women MUST
> choose jobs that require brick hodding or mine working.

Equality includes responsibility and responsibility goes hand in hand into
ACCEPTING the idea that there are things that may need doing that one finds
physically unpleasant. This includes entry into dangerous jobs when a space
is available. Equality demands NO less, otherwise just harping about
'choice' from a safe place is really just selfishness. If one can't meet a
standard, quit the work, and shut the *** up about 'equality'.

Regardless, all work is NOT the same, some is more dangerous and difficult
than others and requires more compensation. If women want 'safer' work, they
can get office work, but remember: nothing done in an office, NOTHING, is so
invaluable that it can't be done in China or India, so think really hard
about that before you demand 'equal wages' for work that is less than.

> The truth is
> that both sexes choose the work they do and that the work they do
> should not be evaluated on a sexist standard.

What sexism is there that expects equal work from equal people?

After all, women can do everything men can, AND gestate so this should be a
snap!

> Until men start
> gestating and delivering our nation's children she does not have a
> third leg to stand on, but perhaps she could borrow a flacid one from
> one of the bitter twitters here.

Bwahahahah! NOW we hide behind a physical difference!

I'm loving seeing you get your hair rubbed the wrong way, pussycat.

Guess what I've been on about isn't so off the mark - or is this columnist
one of Dave Sim's 'cockpuppets' too?

>>>Bwahahahah!<<<

Deb.
.

Quantcast