Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap


Hyerdahl wrote:
> Viking wrote:
>
> > Cool. Way to go, AU.
> > Yet I find it inconceivable that the US will ever see anything like
> > that.
>
> In the US you cannot serve boys at the expense of girls or girls at the
> expense of boys. And time will tell whether the Australian law will
> support such as well. Here in the US
> we have laws that prevent favoring one sex over the other unless there
> is some form of discrimination. Clearly, there isn't.

Clearly there is, Hy--disparate impact, and all that. ***, you
yourself argued that numbers alone was enough to prove discrimination
at the LA Times with regards to a lack of opinion columns written by
women. All of a sudden numbers aren't good anymore? Even when we have
more than numbers?

.

Quantcast