Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- From: "Hyerdahl" <Hyerdahl3@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Dec 2005 08:52:24 -0800
Viking wrote:
> Cool. Way to go, AU.
> Yet I find it inconceivable that the US will ever see anything like
> that.
In the US you cannot serve boys at the expense of girls or girls at the
expense of boys. And time will tell whether the Australian law will
support such as well. Here in the US
we have laws that prevent favoring one sex over the other unless there
is some form of discrimination. Clearly, there isn't.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- From: Ken Chaddock
- Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- From: Ben
- Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- From: Viking
- Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- References:
- Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- From: connor_a@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- From: Viking
- Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- Prev by Date: Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- Next by Date: Re: New Hampshire 2005 Report on the Status of Men - Intro
- Previous by thread: Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- Next by thread: Re: Boys' education funds unveiled to reduce gender gap
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
