Re: Child Support Agency forced to pay back wrongly accused men

"Barry Pearson" (news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) slurps his fella kook:
> Borgerson Daddy Sir Galahad pedanted to no purpose or wit:
>> > "Barry Pearson" (news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) asks:
>> > > Andre Lieven wrote:
>> > > [snip]
>> > >> Note that only 29.9% of NCP mothers are ordered to pay any Child
>> > >> Support, and of that small number, nearly half ( 46.9% ) *totally*
>> > >> default on paying, leaving only 15.9% of NCP mothers who pay a dime
>> > >> at all.
>> > > [snip]
>> > >
>> > > Does that refer to the UK?

Says the illiterate yob who can't read that soc.men isn't a UK specific
group...

> [snip]
>> One might assume from his posting address that Andre is referring to
>> Canadian statistics, but you can't really tell since he cites no
>> reference for the data.

I did, earlier on. POst that retards fail to read, still were written.

> [snip]
>> > There are more North Americans on the 'Net than UK-ers, as there ARE
>> > more NAmericans than UK-ers.
> [snip]
>> It would still be helpful if people posting statistics about a
>> population would define the population which the statistics
>> describe. If Andre is referring to "North Americans", I guess
>> we would have to assume that he has posted an amalgam of
>> statistics from the US, Canada and Mexico, Caribbean Islands,
>> and even Greenland! ;-)

Well, morons, reatrds and WomenFirsters can ASSume what they like.

No one else need pay them any mind, for they have none.

> [snip]
>
> Thank you for that.

Says Moron #2...

> I'll assume that Andre Lieven was talking about
> somewhere in the North Americans; perhaps just Canada, perhaps a wider
> area.

Meyer and Garansky, Technical Analysis Paper #42, US Dept. of Health
and Human Services, Office of Income Security Policy.

Now, you *could* have been an honest non-retard, and ASKED me.

But, you chose, instead, to display your trolling reatrditude, and
slurp a fellow loon troll. So, I've shown you far too much courtesy.
Certainly more than your loon trollingness deserves.

> My query arose because the original post was purely about the UK. I am
> trying to help change the system there (here!) I realise that people
> have their own concerns, but off-topic responses just confuse things if
> they don't identify their scope. (I'll guess that some people reading
> this newsgroup are from Australia, which has its own different
> statistics).

If you were serious about that, you wouldn't have " thanked " someone
going really off the beam about postcard sized peripheries of North
America...

So, don't try to fool non retard trolls; you ain't succeeding...

Andre

.

Relevant Pages