Re: Another Woman Hero
- From: connor_a@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 14 Nov 2005 19:15:30 -0800
John Royer wrote:
>
> I suppose the definition of hero is what is at issue here. A hero to me, is
> someone who helps someone else with out expecting something in return.
> Someone who risks all, someone who gives unselfishly, someone who is admired
> for making a stand. I don't think gender has anything to do with being a
> hero. I think parents who do without so their kids can go to school and
> attain more than the parents ever had the opprtunity to do are heroes. I
> think kids who help their younger brothers and sister are heroes. I think
> people who work with disadvantaged people are heroes. I think people who
> need to put other people down in order to make themselves seem more than
> they are are false heroes.
>
> Although I watch Hyerdahls postings and I do take issue with some of it, I
> also see some truths. Only hate can blind us and stop us from seeing the
> truly heroic, regardless of circumstance.
But we can see through the feminist hate and realise it is men, mostly
invisible men like myself who have saved lives yet receive no
recognition of such heroic deeds.
Why? Because as men we just get on with the job... with feminists, they
demand men erect statues of women just because they are women!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Another Woman Hero
- From: Hyerdahl
- Re: Another Woman Hero
- References:
- Another Woman Hero
- From: Hyerdahl
- Re: Another Woman Hero
- From: rdubose
- Re: Another Woman Hero
- From: mathewsantifeminism
- Re: Another Woman Hero
- From: Hyerdahl
- Re: Another Woman Hero
- From: John Royer
- Another Woman Hero
- Prev by Date: Re: Another Woman Hero
- Next by Date: Income gaps
- Previous by thread: Re: Another Woman Hero
- Next by thread: Re: Another Woman Hero
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|