Re: BBC-Women's health fuelling poverty


Andre Lieven wrote:
> "lukne" (laurann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx) whines, because she CANNOT debate/
> refute Ian's accurate point:
> > Ian wrote:
> >> Yes. I thought it was such complete rubbish that I didn't bother
> >> commenting on it. However, since you have...
> >>
> >> Men contribute to the taxation pool, and women take from it.
> >
> > Wow, I've been taking from the taxation pool all these years?
>
> Yes.
>
> > So all
> > those checks I've written to the U.S. IRS each April will be returned
> > to me and then some? Tell me when -- I can't wait!
>
> Ah, you are an economic retard who somehow, insanely, believes
> that the taxes that she pays have no relationship with the services
> available to her, including loads of women-sex-specific ones denied
> to taxpaying men...

Please tell me what women-only services have I received since you seem
to think you know me better than I know myself. Enlighten me please.

>
> OK, we are happy to conceed any degree of your economic illiteracy
> that you see fit to admit to...

Economic illiteracy that I pay taxes and have for almost all of my
adult life?

> >> It therefore follows that in order to increase wealth, keep men alive,
> >> and let women die as soon as they've *** out their kids.
> >
> > Your mother would be so proud . . .
>
> Indeed, she would be proud that Ian knows facts.

So, to you, it's a fact that women must die after they "***" out their
kids. That's quite a fact Andre.

> A shame yours
> cannot be proud of you for that...

My mother was a traditional conservative women who would nevertheless
be repulsed by your idiotic tales of woe.


>
> Andre
>
>
>
> --
> " I'm a man... But, I can change... If I have to... I guess. "
> The Man Prayer, Red Green.

.

Loading