Re: Meg Munn chunters on...

In article <1126633945.715932.72090@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
"Hyerdahl" <Hyerdahl3@xxxxxxx> wrote:

> All the money in the world would be pointless were it not for loved
> ones to spend it on.
>
> [Again, women are buying their own houses these days, dear, and
> providing for their OWN families. They aren't asking you.]

I'm holding off buying a home myself because numerous
respected investors (including Greenspan)
say there's a real estate bubble.

If a liberated career woman wants to bust her ***
to pay an interest-only mortgage for what's
precious to her, she's welcome to it. I'll just
pick it up when the market drops by 30% (or more).

I'm reminded of career women during the 90's bragging
that they could buy their own diamond rings. A few years
later, the market on diamonds plunged.

> We recognise that> most geeks, me included, would love to have some
> young birds working along side us, (provided they can take jokes about
> tits without running off trying to hold the company to ransom, for the
> twin purposes of getting money for nothing, and ruining our work
> environment because they hate men's sense of humour,)
>
> [The workplace isn't the place for boys being boys at the expense of
> everyone else and burgers like you are bound to discover that at some
> point in time. :-)]

I believe Bill Clinton got an education in this.
Goodbye national daycare and healthcare!
What's good for the goose...

regards,
Mark Sobolewski
.

Quantcast