Re: APOLLO HOAX !!!

On Oct 17, 9:26 am, "mailman" <mail...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.erichufschmid.net/Interview-with-Bart-Sibrel.html

Like millions of people around the world, Bart Sibrel was fascinated
with the Apollo moon landing when he was a child. The walls of his bedroom
were filled with pictures of the Apollo moon landing.

Years later, as an adult, he heard that NASA faked the Apollo moon
landings. Since he was making films for a living, he decided to investigate
Apollo and create a documentary about it.

Bart Sibrel spent five years and $500,000 on the research and filming
of his Apollo documentary, starting in 1996. The end result was A Funny
Thing Happened On The Way To The Moon:
www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie

He acquired a lot of video from NASA's archives during his research.
One of the containers of video was mis-marked. Inside was video that had not
been edited for the public. Instead, it contained the raw video directly
from the Apollo spacecraft.

If the Apollo astronauts really did go to the moon, it would not
matter if somebody acquired unedited video.

However, this particular unedited video showed the astronauts in orbit
around the earth, and they were setting up for a photo to make it appear as
if the earth was a small sphere a long distance away, thereby creating the
illusion that they were halfway to the moon.

The public was supposed to see only the portion of the video in which
the earth looks tiny; we were not supposed to watch the astronauts set up
the image.

This video proves that the astronauts never went beyond Earth orbit,
which in turn means the entire moon landing was faked.

More information about his videos are here, plus video excerpts:
www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie/default.asp?ID=7

Do you need more evidence?

We have hundreds of ways to prove that Apollo astronauts never went to
the moon. However, as with the 9/11 attack, the people who defend the
official story will ignore our proof and bring up issues that we cannot
answer. For example, the Apollo defenders might ask,

"Well, if the astronauts didn't go to the moon, then where did they
film the moon landing?"
For those of you who are familiar with the 9/11 attack, this is
equivalent to people asking:
"Well, if Flight 77 didn't crash into the Pentagon, where is it?"

We don't have to know where Flight 77 is in order to prove that it did
not hit the Pentagon, and we don't have to know all the details about Apollo
in order to prove that the moon landing was a fake.

Reflectors on the moon are not proof!

As another example, the Apollo defenders will tell us there is a
reflector on the moon.

However, the Russians supposedly dropped a reflector on the moon with
an unmanned spacecraft. The Americans also sent unmanned probes to the moon.

A reflector on the moon does not prove people landed on the moon.
Instead, it only proves that there is a reflector on the moon.

Besides, where is the proof that a reflector is on the moon? The
people who claim there is a reflector are the same people who tell us fire
brought down the World Trade Center buildings.

There is no shortage of liars, idiots, and fools in our government and
universities.

Who was on the "moon"?

Bart Sibrel shows that Neil Armstrong, Buzz Aldrin, and Michael
Collins were circling the earth at the time they were supposedly halfway to
the moon.

This brings up the question, if the astronauts were circling the earth
the entire time, who was on the "moon"?

Two possibilities are:

A) The astronauts on the "moon" were actors.
B) NASA had filmed the moon landing weeks in advance.

Bart Sibrel selects option A. He thinks that the astronauts circling
the Earth were providing the audio and the actors on the moon were silent.

However, to confuse the issue, there is a video of a light fixture
falling down just as Armstrong is about to step onto the moon's surface:
video.google docid=2978000599933199881

Bart Sibrel believes that video was created by a filmmaker for a joke,
although he acknowledges that a government may have created it in order to
discredit the theories that the Apollo moon landing was faked.

However, if that video clip was from a rehearsal of the moon landing,
that means the moon landing was filmed before the Apollo 11 spacecraft was
launched.

What do you think?

Why don't the Russians expose the Apollo Moon hoax?

My assumption was that the Russians did not want to expose Apollo
because America could retaliate by exposing some of their crimes, as I wrote
here:
RebuttalsToScienceChallenge.html

Bart Sibrel points out that the Russians -- and other nations -- would
not want to expose Apollo because they would prefer to blackmail the
American government.

Are the Astronauts happy with themselves?

There were six different teams of astronauts that landed on the moon;
namely, Apollo 11 through Apollo 17, with Apollo 13 only circling the moon.

I suppose the astronauts imagine themselves as special, but have they
been enjoying life since the returned from the moon? Are the astronauts
proud of what they have done to America?

None of the astronauts seem happy. Instead, they seem to hiding from
us, like criminals.

I suggest you consider that the astronauts are Useful Idiots; fools,
suckers, losers. And they have brought tremendous harm to America.

David Wolper, a friend of Neil Armstrong, and Penn and Teller, are
probably the few people laughing about Apollo:

. Axis_of_Perverts2.html

. DoesDavidWolperHaveRedeemingSocialValue.html

Why do UFOs promoters also promote Apollo?

Most of the 9/11 truth seekers defend or ignore Apollo. Most of the
people who believe in UFOs and crop circles also defend or ignore Apollo. Is
this a coincidence? Why don't any of them expose Apollo?

I think most of the 9/11 truth seekers and UFO promoters are working
for the same criminal network. The UFO people may have helped with the
Apollo landing, and they may have been involved in building this UFO craft:
FlyingSaucers.html

Astronauts Gone Wild

Bart Sibrel also made a video called Astronauts Gone Wild. In this
video he tracks down many of the astronauts and tries to get them to talk
about the moon landing and swear on a Bible that they actually did go to the
moon. Information about it is at:
www.moonmovie.com/moonmovie

The last astronaut in the video pushes Bart and his cameraman out of
his house, but he accidentally leaves his microphone on. The astronaut's son
can be heard asking his father:

"Do you want to call the CIA and have them waxed?"

Is it possible that the astronauts have been told that they will be
given any protection they need, including the murder of people who try to
expose the Apollo hoax?

In such a case, the phone calls at the CIA office must be interesting:

Good morning! CIA headquarters. May I help you?
Connect me to George Tenet.

Sir, he is in a meeting. Who is calling?

I'm one of the Apollo astronauts! I don't care if what the meeting
is! Get him! Now!

Hello?

Hey, George, I want you to wax someone. His name is Bart Sibrel. He
lives in Tennessee. This time... uh,... don't shoot him! Drown him in the
Mississippi River. And hurry it up!

Yes, Sir! Would you like a beverage with that waxing?

Don't be a smart ass, or I'll have you drowned also, like that other
smart ass, Dulles.

That was Colby, not Dulles. Didn't you watch the Desperate Wives
video at HugeQuestions.com?

I don't remember your f'ing names! Just shut up and do your job!

APOLLO HOAX !!!
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.space.history/browse_frm/thread/ef033169347f02b3/c64af0242a3f215e#c64af0242a3f215e

There's still a whole lot more to our moon landing hoax and subsequent
hocus-pocus than being told by those semitic insiders and otherwise by
all those having "the right stuff" that simply had to be in the know.

Add in the honest all-inclusive (birth to grave) 10X factor of
whatever our government actually spends, as then you'll soon enough
realize how many of those perpetrated cold-war jobs related to
everything NASA/Apollo are at risk, and most of those folks would
obviously kill (even their own kind) in order to keep those nifty jobs
and vast benefits.

Not only is the cold-war cat but the dog as well as most everything
else has gotten out of the bag, and to think the likes of "David
Groves" doesn't even take into account the rather unusually stealth
Venus, that which is technically impossible to have gone unnoticed if
NASA/Apollo were actually orbiting and/or taking those EVAs and having
recorded those unfiltered Kodak moments upon our salty old naked moon
that's also unavoidably anticathode saturated in gamma and X-rays.
There's also that little pesky matter of their artificial xenon lamp
spectrum worth of what's shining upon that modified guano island's
simulated solar illuminated surface, that's oddly entirely w/o UV
(exactly as a xenon lamp spectrum should be).

Others of NASA's all-knowing rusemaster kind obviously have nothing of
honest physics or science to contribute about our hocus-pocus NASA/
Apollo missions. Why is it that such silly folks can't even tell us
where the heck that extremely vibrant and at time nearby Venus was
hiding as of each and every hour of those supposed EVAs, and
apparently as being so well hidden from any orbital view as well?

These folks don't even need a supercomputer for sharing the whole
truth and nothing but the truth as easily derived from any of their 3D
interactive orbital simulators, although we the public seem to own
dozens of such spendy supercomputers, as well as having paid for all
the necessary simulation software several times over. Go right ahead
and place yourself as though situated on that physically dark moon and
looking at the horizon, and then tell the rest of us village idiots
whatever you might see of Venus, and even of Earth and Venus as easily
being within the same FOV(frame of view).

(where's Venus?)
Should I suggest taking a good simulated look-see at missions A-11,
A-14 and A-16 to start off with? (it should be right there in plain
sight)
- Brad Guth -

.