Re: Value of Stalingrad
- From: David H Thornley <david@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 10:53:02 -0500
Malcom "Mal" Reynolds wrote:
They were pounding the Germans quite successfully. The fact
For that matter, why didn't the Soviets
allow the Germans to capture Stalingrad
and then pound the Germans. It's not
like the Germans would have been able to
support any kind of worthwhile activity
there.
that they were losing territory in Stalingrad doesn't affect that.
It was a quite effective meatgrinder.
Moreover, Stalingrad had the nice effect of putting Sixth Army
into a position to be encircled. If they'd have just given
it up, Axis forces would likely have assumed a better defensive
deployment.
--
David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask.
david@xxxxxxxxxxxx | If you don't, flee.
http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O-
.
- References:
- Value of Stalingrad
- From: Malcom \"Mal\" Reynolds
- Value of Stalingrad
- Prev by Date: Re: Value of Stalingrad
- Next by Date: Re: Von Paulus disobeys an order
- Previous by thread: Re: Value of Stalingrad
- Next by thread: Re: Value of Stalingrad
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|