Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: Stephen Graham <graham1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:11:02 -0500
Bay Man wrote:
British performance was curtailed by poor leadership and inferior equipment. The German 88 cannon made a hell of a difference picking off tanks at great range. British tankers refereed to their own tanks has having pee-shooters on the top. The British had more men with inferior equipment, so not equal.
As has been noted in this group before, the way most armies kill AT guns is with artillery, not tanks. The British had the requisite equipment to kill those guns; lack of effective combined arms operations caused the issues. There's a good discussion of this in French's _Raising Churchill's Army_.
.
- References:
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: Bay Man
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: kenney
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: Bay Man
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: Stephen Graham
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: Bay Man
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: David H Thornley
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- From: Bay Man
- Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- Prev by Date: Re: What battle would be the decisive battle of WW2?
- Next by Date: Re: Ju 88 defection Re: Rudolf Hess's flight to Scotland
- Previous by thread: Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- Next by thread: Re: Anybody Read Pat Buchannan's Unnecessary War?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading