Re: The importance of the Battle of Midway

Dave Anderer wrote:
In article <mKadnX5eAILbL0XanZ2dnUVZ_t-nnZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Bill Shatzer <bshatzerNO@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

-snip-


Coupled with naval gunfire support and (presumably) complete air superiority, that should have been sufficient to successfully invade and capture the island - albeit at some cost.

I'm not aware that the Japanese had any real doctrine for NGFS at this point.

You're correct on that - or at least not anything approaching the directed naval gun fire that the US Navy developed in the second half of the war.

Still, IIRC, the Japanese plan called for sending in the heavy cruiser division (Kumano et al) ahead of the invasion force to pound the hell out of Midway. Sand and Eastern Islands are not all that large and directed naval gun fire is really not required. Just hitting the islands would be likely to hit something. While an hour or so's worth of bombardment by 8" guns is gonna mostly stir up a lot of sand, it's also almost certain to mess things up considerably, bust up a lot of communications wire, take out some emplacements, and inflict some significant casualties.

Additional bombardment by the escorts to the landing forces (a light cruiser and eight or ten destroyers) would only have added to the general mayhem.

The air superiority was limited, both in number (the carriers were under-strength to start with, and were taking losses) and staying power.

Well, I was thinking more along the lines that Japanese operations would be unhindered by US aerial opposition - not so much that the Japanese would be applying air power against the island's defenses as that the US would be unable to apply any air power against the Japanese or their supporting naval forces.

Although, G4Ms staging out of Wake Island would have had the range to reach Midway - 'though I'm don't think the Japanese had that in their contingency plans.

There were sufficient US subs available that, had they simply concentrated at the atoll, something useful might have occurred.

I'd considered that - but at that stage of the war, US submarine torpedoes were rather notoriously unreliable - and US submarine commanders were notoriously unaggressive. The US subs might have raised some havoc but there are reasons for thinking that they might have not accomplished much at all. Nautilus, after all, was unable to get a hit at essentially point blank range on Kaga which was then almost dead in the water.

The Japanese were also landing over an open reef, against significant, well-entrenched firepower. It seems to me to have been more like a mix of Tenaru and Tarawa.

Clearly a Japanese landing would have incurred some significant cost for the invaders. I'm just not sure the cost would have been sufficient to repel the landings. After all, the Tarawa invasion was at some considerable cost to the US Marines but the landings were ultimately successful and the island taken, none the less.

Cheers,

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Last Days of World War II
    ... > over water, invasion of Sakhalin. ... action on that island being a drive south down the center of the island ... from the border between the Russian territory and the Japanese ... the Russians retained everything north of the ...
    (soc.history.war.world-war-ii)
  • Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George
    ... >>The cost per car for the CEO is much less than transport costs. ... But add in all the other overpaid execs, the stock options, ... > It was real estate lending that sank the Japanese financial system, ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: OT-War history repeats itself
    ... probably should have been indicted for complicity in the war. ... A better question might be why did we let those Japanese off scott free ... Island nation. ... Tax and spend! ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: von Mises Institute on Henry George
    ... The Japanese car makers are just more efficient. ... >The cost per car for the CEO is much less than transport costs. ... But add in all the other overpaid execs, the stock options, ...
    (sci.econ)
  • Re: Nazi Superweapons in SF
    ... would probably have been worth the cost of three large submarines. ... and the US/UK surface fleet against Japanese land ...
    (rec.arts.sf.written)