Re: B-26 Marauder not as good as the B-25?
- From: Bill Shatzer <bshatzerNO@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2008 20:38:25 -0500
eunometic@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I think
from the B-25G onwars the wing span was increased to improve handling
which had deteriorated due to weight growth.
The B-25's wing span remained constant at 67'7" for all models from the initial B-25 through the final B-25J.
The B-26's wing span was increased from 65'0" to 71'0" about 600 aircraft into the B-26B production run.
I'm not sure why the increased span aircraft wasn't given a separate model designation but the larger wing span B-26 was just designated the B-26B-10. Certainly the modified wing was a significant enough change to warrant a new model designation.
Cheers,
.
- References:
- B-26 Marauder not as good as the B-25?
- From: Branek
- Re: B-26 Marauder not as good as the B-25?
- From: eunometic
- B-26 Marauder not as good as the B-25?
- Prev by Date: Re: Ignoring the Holocaust
- Next by Date: Re: QF 3.7 inch AA gun
- Previous by thread: Re: B-26 Marauder not as good as the B-25?
- Next by thread: Re: B-26 Marauder not as good as the B-25?
- Index(es):