Re: Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- From: WaltBJ <waltbj01@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:50:25 -0500
On Jan 16, 6:44 pm, thorn...@xxxxxxxx (David Thornley) wrote:
In article <hZijj.178$u...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,They were saturation weapons. Have you seen clips of the rocket-
Branek <barronbra...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I've always been curious as to how effective unguided, surface to surfaceSNIP:
rockets were
in WW2.
launching small ships firing at a beach prior to the landing? They
were aimed, in a sense - they all landed in the same general area.
Unless you were in a bunker you were exposed to them. 6 from a
nebelwerfer - 24 or so from a Sherman tank, hundreds from a bank of
Katyushas, several times that from an LSM(R) (ISTR that term) - the
landing support rocket launching ship(s). Just like carpet bombing but
I believe a degree more accurate.
Walt BJ
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- From: Michael Emrys
- Re: Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- References:
- Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- From: Branek
- Re: Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- From: David Thornley
- Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- Prev by Date: Re: Occupied France Question - How Much was Physically Occupied by Germany?
- Next by Date: Re: German Weapons Overengineered?
- Previous by thread: Re: Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- Next by thread: Re: Unguided, surface to surface rockets in WW2: effective?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|