Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: mtfester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:34:40 -0400
Andrew Clark <aclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Scott M. Kozel" <kozelsm@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
The Philippines were a U.S. territory at that point, with 17 million
civilians living under a rather cruel Japanese occupation. The other
places had comparatively tiny (or no) populations of civilians that were
of direct interest to the U.S.
The NEI, Malaya and Burma had rather large civilian populations too the
rescue of which the US did not perceive as a priority. In fact., rescuing
Surely the British were more than capable of handling the latter wo
without US help?
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Brad Meyer
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- References:
- Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Yau
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Duwop
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Brad Meyer
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: L2007
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Andrew Clark
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Scott M. Kozel
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Andrew Clark
- Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Prev by Date: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Next by Date: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Previous by thread: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Next by thread: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|