Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: mtfester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 21:20:49 -0400
Andrew Clark <aclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<mtfester@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
Sorry, there was no more compelling reason to take on the Japanese
in Burma/India than in the PI.
The two situations are entirely different.
Burma is connected to India by a land border;
Which is irrelevant to the fact that they weren't in Japan defending
Japanese territory, and there was no feasible way for them to be
returned there.
Mike
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Andrew Clark
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- References:
- Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Yau
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: mtfester
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Brad Meyer
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: mtfester
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Brad Meyer
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Stephen Graham
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Brad Meyer
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: mtfester
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Andrew Clark
- Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Prev by Date: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Next by Date: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Previous by thread: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Next by thread: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Index(es):