Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: thornley@xxxxxxxx (David Thornley)
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:57:40 -0400
In article <fc629l$ffs$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Yau <sniper968@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Given the choice between the Philippines and Formosa, Spruance would
I'm just interested in hearing the debate over whether an invasion of the
Philippines could have been avoided in place of an invasion of Okinawa or
Iwo Jima. Its an interesting question and I am sorry that other posters
appear to have deviated from the OT.
have preferred Okinawa and Iwo Jima (see "Nimitz", by E.B. Potter).
--
David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask.
david@xxxxxxxxxxxx | If you don't, flee.
http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O-
.
- References:
- Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Yau
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Yau
- Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: David Thornley
- Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- From: Yau
- Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Prev by Date: Re: Aircraft weapons: cannon or machineguns?
- Next by Date: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Previous by thread: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Next by thread: Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|