Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines



"Duwop" <tutall@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote

Using the same sort of logic one could conclude that France and
England are responsible for WWII, not Germany.

This is not a logical argument, because you are not comparing like with
like. Whether or not the UK (England is one of the nations which make up the
UK) in 1938-39 could avoid war with Germany is an entirely different sort of
situation to whether or not the US in 1944-45 could have avoided invading
the Philippines, or any of the individual islands in that group, or any of
the cities and towns on any of those islands.

Would you like to address whether, in the real historical circumstances
which existed at the time, there was an alternative to invading the
Philippines, or any of the individual islands in that group, or any of the
cities and towns on any of those islands, and thereby inflicting tens of
thousands of civilian deaths? If there was an alternative, why wasn't it
adopted?

And we know you're response to that. Why is this different, because
MacArthur's American?

This sort of childish petty-nationalism is not something that motivates my
posts.

.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Invasion of Okinawa, Iwo Jima instead of Philipines
    ... England are responsible for WWII, not Germany. ... Philippines, or any of the individual islands in that group, or any of the ... their responsibility, but MacArthur's? ...
    (soc.history.war.world-war-ii)
  • Re: names to remember
    ... hanged at the Old Bailey, London, England, in 1650 ... beheaded at Wurzburg, Germany, ... burned at Carcassonne, France in 1330 ... > Arnold, (first name unknown): hanged at Barking, England, in 1574 ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: names to remember
    ... hanged at the Old Bailey, London, England, in 1650 ... Ancker,: beheaded at Wurzburg, Germany, ... burned at Carcassonne, France in 1330 ... Arnold, (first name unknown): hanged at Barking, England, in 1574 ...
    (alt.gathering.rainbow)
  • Re: Making money from Java
    ... it would have been fairly easy for England or France to ... >> France sure could have done so to Germany in 1933-34, ... > rejection of rule by law, and establishing instead a rule by armed ...
    (comp.lang.cobol)
  • Re: Was Hitler a Darwinian?
    ... Operation Sea Lion is best understood as no more than a bluff. ... The term I used - planning - is much more extensive and (at the level ... It isn't obvious at all what Germany wanted to achieve ... namely that Germany really wanted to invade England. ...
    (talk.origins)