Re: British Tanks

In article <1182048572.038560.239220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Walt <Walterm140@xxxxxxx> wrote:

Taken as a whole, the Brits had very poor tanks.

They weren't all that impressive up until the end of 1944, but
"very poor" seems quite an exaggeration. Why do you think that?

US tanks were scandalously bad also, but not as bad as the Brits.

In what way? They seemed to get the job done, overall, without
excessive losses.


--
David H. Thornley | If you want my opinion, ask.
david@xxxxxxxxxxxx | If you don't, flee.
http://www.thornley.net/~thornley/david/ | O-

.