soc.history.war.world-war-ii

• Thread Index

---

• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Michele
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Walt
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: E.F.Schelby
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Status of Dutch East Indies from May 1940 - December 1941
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Walt
• Re: Status of Dutch East Indies from May 1940 - December 1941
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Rich
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Dave Smith
• Status of Dutch East Indies from May 1940 - December 1941
  • From: Wesley Johnston
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Operational surprise
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Robert Sveinson
• Re: "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: John Anderton
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• "Mixed" bomber formations?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: mike
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Branek
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Rich
• Re: 3 Questions on "Schindler's List"
  • From: Marvin
• Re: Rommel to Russian Front: was it ever considered?
  • From: dave gower
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Stephen Gluck
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Kari T Seppänen
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: eunometic
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Rich
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Singapore - one version of what happened
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Rommel to Russian Front: was it ever considered?
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Rommel to Russian Front: was it ever considered?
  • From: Matt Wiser
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: 3 Questions on "Schindler's List"
  • From: Wesley Johnston
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Singapore - one version of what happened
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Could North Africa have cost Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Michele
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Michele
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Michele
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Michele
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: jussi . jalonen
• Re: Could North Africa have cost Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Could North Africa have cost Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Louis C
• Re: 3 Questions on "Schindler's List"
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Operational surprise
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Could North Africa have cost Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Louis C
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Yau
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: William Black
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Yau
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Yau
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: David Thornley
• Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Samuel
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: 3 Questions on "Schindler's List"
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: E.F.Schelby
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Yau
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Michele
• Re: British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: Binnacle
• Re: Operational surprise
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Michele
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: T. Fink
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: mtfester
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Disco_Stu
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: AGw. (Usenet)
• Re: Singapore - one version of what happened
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: William Black
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: wm
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: Frederick J. Barnett
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: weasel
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Operational surprise
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: ThePro
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Michele
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Operational surprise
  • From: Louis C
• 3 Questions on "Schindler's List"
  • From: Wesley Johnston
• Re: Singapore - one version of what happened
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Richard Macdonald
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: John Anderton
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Davide Pastore
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: mtfester
• Re: British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Kari T Seppänen
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Kari T Seppänen
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Kari T Seppänen
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Operational surprise
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German re-unification a violation of Yalta?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Don Kirkman
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: E.F.Schelby
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: Michele
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Michele
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: German re-unification a violation of Yalta?
  • From: AGw. (Usenet)
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: AGw. (Usenet)
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: eunometic
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Michele
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Video footage of Normandy Omaha beach invasion?
  • From: Dwilma
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Yau
• Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: mtfester
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Davide Pastore
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: eunometic
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: eunometic
• Re: Video footage of Normandy Omaha beach invasion?
  • From: Dr.Colon.Oscopy@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: William Black
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Michele
• Re: Video footage of Normandy Omaha beach invasion?
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Louis C
• Railroad projects
  • From: Louis C
• Operational surprise
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: JCarew
• Re: 4th Armored
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Singapore - one version of what happened
  • From: a425couple
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Davide Pastore
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: mtfester
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: Bill Baker
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: Video footage of Normandy Omaha beach invasion?
  • From: zcarenow@xxxxxxxxx
• Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: mike
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• 4th Armored
  • From: TH
• Re: Video footage of Normandy Omaha beach invasion?
  • From: Wesley Johnston
• Re: Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: eunometic
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: eunometic
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: andytoole
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Video footage of Normandy Omaha beach invasion?
  • From: zcarenow@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: M. J. Powell
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: eunometic
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: William Black
• Could North Africa have costed Hitler Stalingrad
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: War Warnings
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Davide Pastore
• War Warnings
  • From: Jim Lillie
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Midway
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: William Black
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Robert Sveinson
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: JCarew
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: mtfester
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: nightjar
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Canaris
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Christopher Manteuffel
• Re: Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: John Anderton
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Internment in Eire
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Michele
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Question on Japanese home industries in WWII
  • From: Frederick J. Barnett
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: horseman2
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Hal Hanig
• British Infantry fighting Weapons
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: eunometic
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: eunometic
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: Michele
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Midway
  • From: Yau
• Re: Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: Yau
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: dave gower
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: Samuel
• Re: Midway
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Louis C
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: dave gower
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: Bobstamp
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: E.F.Schelby
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Dave Anderer
• Re: Singapore - what happened
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Greek Civil War (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: John Mayson
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: narrledudh
• Singapore (was Japanese Plan)
  • From: a425couple
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Haydn
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: Louis C
• Anti Tank Equipment
  • From: Biggs
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Singapore - questions
  • From: a425couple
• Internment in Eire
  • From: Bobstamp
• Re: Best WW2 infantry fighting books?
  • From: Walt
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Midway
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Greek Civil War (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: fred
• Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Yau
• Re: On-line week-by-week WW2 map showing who controls what?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Re: Midway - effects on VJ day?
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Bletchley Park and the Russians
  • From: Pyers
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Barbarrosa Question 2
  • From: Biggs
• Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German re-unification a violation of Yalta?
  • From: Dr. Barry Worthington
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: On-line week-by-week WW2 map showing who controls what?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Andrew Clark
• 278th Signal Pigeon Company
  • From: Wesley Johnston
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• German re-unification a violation of Yalta?
  • From: Paul
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: jussi . jalonen
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: John Mayson
• Re: Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: narrledudh
• On-line week-by-week WW2 map showing who controls what?
  • From: Hugo S. Cunningham
• Different Allied Tactics in 1940
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Midway
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: JCarew
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Barbarrosa to 1945
  • From: Piotr Borowski
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Timo Nieminen
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Michele
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Japanese Plan.
  • From: mtfester
• Re: Midway
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Barbarrosa to 1945
  • From: Louis C
• Japanese Plan.
  • From: Bob
• Re: Best WW2 infantry fighting books?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: E.F.Schelby
• Best WW2 infantry fighting books?
  • From: GreatArtist
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: David Thornley
• Barbarrosa to 1945
  • From: Biggs
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Jim Lillie
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Doug
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Louis C
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Louis C
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Doug
• Re: Midway - effects on VJ day?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: mike
• Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: RICHARD ANDERSON
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Michele
• Re: Midway
  • From: Yau
• Re: Ensigns at Dunkirk
  • From: Binnacle
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: mtfester
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Midway
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Jeremy Thomson
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Christopher Manteuffel
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Doug
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Doug
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Why no souvenirs? 80th article of war
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Why no souvenirs? 80th article of war
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: Midway
  • From: R Leonard
• Re: Japanese 'plan' - new math
  • From: a425couple
• Ensigns at Dunkirk
  • From: Joe Anderson
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: lesliemills2002@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Italian forces fighting for the Allies?
  • From: Eystein Roll Aarseth
• Re: Why no souvenirs? 80th article of war
  • From: Michele
• Re: Midway - effects on VJ day?
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Jim Lillie
• Re: Hitler's jewish soldiers!!!
  • From: Michele
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Midway
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Midway
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: Michele
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Jeremy Thomson
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: nightjar
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: JCarew
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joel Shepherd
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Walt
• Re: Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Louis C
• Fighter formation
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Ju 87G rear machine guns
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Why no souvenirs?
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Midway
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: Dwilma
• Re: Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Re: Midway
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: mtfester
• Britain and US acting against Russia
  • From: brandon
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Re: Midway
  • From: Justin
• Re: best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: Steffensen
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: JCarew
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Dave Kennedy
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Jim Lillie
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: eunometic
• Re: Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Midway
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: mtfester
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Midway
  • From: Walt
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Duwop
• Re: Midway
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Walt
• Re: Midway
  • From: Keith B. Rosenberg
• Re: Midway
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Joel Shepherd
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: William Hughes
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: edward ohare
• Re: Hitler's jewish soldiers!!!
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mooseheadc@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: John Anderton
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: redvet
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Bomb Question
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Japanese 'plan'
  • From: Davide Pastore
• Re: "Schweinfurt-Regensburg" books
  • From: Walt
• Re: Hitler's jewish soldiers!!!
  • From: Doug
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Yau
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Rich
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Dave Kennedy
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Walt
• Bomb Question
  • From: Coconut
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: John Mayson
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Japanese 'plan'
  • From: Coconut
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Dave Kennedy
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Midway
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Hitler's jewish soldiers!!!
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Mike Muth
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Mike Muth
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: eunometic
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: eunometic
• Ju 87G rear machine guns
  • From: ThePro
• Re: Midway
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Hitler's jewish soldiers!!!
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German Outposts
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Midway
  • From: Justin
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: wjhopwood@xxxxxxx
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joel Shepherd
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Richard Macdonald
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: Hitler's jewish soldiers!!!
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Samuel
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Rich
• Re: Midway
  • From: lesliemills2002@xxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: German Outposts
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• German Outposts
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: ThePro
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: bbrought
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: mike
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: eunometic
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: mike
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: eunometic
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: eunometic
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: John Anderton
• Re: Why no souvenirs? 80th article of war
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Doug
• Re: Midway
  • From: Timothy J. Lee
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Midway
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Midway
  • From: Joel Shepherd
• Why no souvenirs? 80th article of war
  • From: Doug
• Re: Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: bernardz
• Re: Midway
  • From: Doug
• Re: Midway
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Bruce Burden
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Doug
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Midway
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Midway
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Midway
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: British Tanks
  • From: John Anderton
• Re: Midway
  • From: Timothy J. Lee
• Re: Conspiracy Theories
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Dave Kennedy
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Midway
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Mike Muth
• Re: Midway
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Mike Muth
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Dave Kennedy
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• British Tanks
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Michele
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Conspiracy Theories
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Midway
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Rich
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Mike Muth
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: eunometic
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Yau
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Bruce Burden
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Bruce Burden
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joel Shepherd
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Taki Kogoma
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Appeasement
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: Italian forces fighting for the Allies?
  • From: Disco_Stu
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: John Anderton
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: dave gower
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Michele
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Michele
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: John Mayson
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Hugo S. Cunningham
• Re: Hitler's jewish soldiers!!!
  • From: deserteagle008
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: james
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: self
• Greek Civil War (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: brandon
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Bruce Burden
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Mike Piacente
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Briarroot
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Cubdriver
• Hans-Ulrich Rudel Ju 87G ace
  • From: Doug
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: narrledudh
• "Schweinfurt-Regensburg" books
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: John Mayson
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Michele
• Re: Italian war reparations?
  • From: Michele
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Dr. Barry Worthington
• Occupation Zones in Germany (was Re: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: ThePro
• Re: Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Appeasement
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Michele
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Michele
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Louis C
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Bruce Burden
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Doug
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: martinclements
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: narrledudh
• Hitler's attitude towards the Japanese
  • From: Yau
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: [OT} Bicycle gun?
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: narrledudh
• Could more of German army in Stalingrad have been taken out was Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Italian war reparations?
  • From: Davide Pastore
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Padraigh ProAmerica
• Re: [OT} Bicycle gun?
  • From: Robert Sveinson
• Re: Ger/Jap codes into intelligence silence
  • From: a425couple
• Dutch Film - "Black Book"
  • From: Charlie Siegrist
• Re: Italian war reparations?
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: [OT} Bicycle gun?
  • From: rhino
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: a425couple
• Re: Ger/Jap military codes - suggest books
  • From: a425couple
• Italian war reparations?
  • From: brandon
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: DavidWilma
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: DavidWilma
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: DavidWilma
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: BernardZ
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Hal Hanig
• Re: Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: mike
• Re: best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Christopher Manteuffel
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Hugo S. Cunningham
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Iwo Jima - U.S. Invasion Troops
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Invasion of Czechoslovakia
  • From: Pavel Vozenilek
• Re: Invasion of Czechoslovakia
  • From: Pavel Vozenilek
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Michele
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: ThePro
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Nik Simpson
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Briarroot
• Bismarck vs Swordfish
  • From: Dave Anderer
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• best WW2 aviation book?
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Walt
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Walt
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Michele
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Piotr Borowski
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• German ww2 strategy: why N. Africa or Crete?
  • From: Doug
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Doug
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Doug
• Iwo Jima - U.S. Invasion Troops
  • From: Scott M. Kozel
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Invasion of Czechoslovakia
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: weasel
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Greek Civil War (was: UK treatment of China in WW2)
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Invasion of Czechoslovakia
  • From: Mossie
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Best history of WWII
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Peter
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: mooseheadc@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Invasion of Czechoslovakia
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: [OT} Bicycle gun?
  • From: mooseheadc@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: Best history of WWII
  • From: Joel Shepherd
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• [OT} Bicycle gun?
  • From: rhino
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: ErrolC
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Commanders (Gound Forces)
  • From: Biggs
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Invasion of Czechoslovakia
  • From: Biggs
• Re: "Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe"?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Best history of WWII
  • From: Doug
• Re: "Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe"?
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Japanese Navy ships sunk near Malaya, Borneo, and Singapore
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• "Rise and Fall of the Luftwaffe"?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Robert Sveinson
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: Best history of WWII
  • From: Tommy
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: rrostrom . 21stcentury
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Appeasement
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: narrledudh
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Jukka O. Kauppinen
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Doug
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: weasel
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Michele
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: Japanese Navy ships sunk near Malaya, Borneo, and Singapore
  • From: Andrew Robert Breen
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Yau
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Hugo S. Cunningham
• German/Japanese military codes
  • From: Doug
• Re: Japanese Navy ships sunk near Malaya, Borneo, and Singapore
  • From: Yau
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: David Thornley
• [Moderator Note] Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: B-29 strikes on Japan from Aleutians
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Japanese Navy ships sunk near Malaya, Borneo, and Singapore
  • From: Mike Muth
• Re: Japans invasion of Russia with Germany
  • From: Palex
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: B-29 strikes on Japan from Aleutians
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Japans invasion of Russia with Germany
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Japanese Navy ships sunk near Malaya, Borneo, and Singapore
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: james
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Louis C
• Japanese Navy ships sunk near Malaya, Borneo, and Singapore
  • From: Yau
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Michele Armellini
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: ErrolC
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Finnish Sturmgeschütz III: log modification
  • From: mike
• Re: Finnish Sturmgeschütz III: log modification
  • From: Shawn Wilson
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Dave Smith
• 'At Leningrad's Gates'
  • From: Jim
• Re: Appeasement
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Appeasement
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Haydn
• Re: Finnish Sturmgeschütz III: log modification
  • From: nightjar
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Takata
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Takata
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: ErrolC
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Duwop
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Finnish Sturmgeschütz III: log modification
  • From: Tero P. Mustalahti
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Louis C
• Re: UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Louis C
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: RAF - First Battle of El Alamein
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Japans invasion of Russia with Germany
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• UK treatment of China in WW2
  • From: Doug
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Jim Lillie
• Re: M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: mike
• Re: B-29 strikes on Japan from Aleutians
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Finnish Sturmgeschütz III: log modification
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: John Lansford
• Re: Japans invasion of Russia with Germany
  • From: dave gower
• Re: Reparations (was Chamberlain's role in Norway debacle)
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Haydn
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Joe Osman
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Alan Meyer
• Re: Appeasement
  • From: Stephen Graham
• M10, M36 tank destroyers: why open-topped turrets?
  • From: Doug
• Re: B-29 strikes on Japan from Aleutians
  • From: Keith B. Rosenberg
• Re: Appeasement
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Haydn
• Re: RAF - First Battle of El Alamein
  • From: maxs75
• Re: Europe vs Pacific
  • From: William Black
• Finnish Sturmgeschütz III: log modification
  • From: Doug
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Takata
• B-29 strikes on Japan from Aleutians
  • From: Doug
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Timo A. Nieminen
• Japans invasion of Russia with Germany
  • From: Biggs
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Jim Lillie
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: AGw. (Usenet)
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Biggs
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Cubdriver
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Italy invades France
  • From: Haydn
• Re: Hitler in Bohemia?
  • From: Pavel Vozenilek
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: John Costello: Germany/Japan and Siberia
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: David Thornley
• Re: Barbarossa: what were the long-term goals (if any)?
  • From: Don Phillipson
• Re: Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: dave gower
• Stalingrad: Could Hitler have saved 6th Army by prompt withdrawal from Caucasus?
  • From: Hugo S. Cunningham
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Diogenes
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: mike
• Re: Barbarossa: what were the long-term goals (if any)?
  • From: histprof
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Barbarossa: what were the long-term goals (if any)?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Italy invades France
  • From: Biggs
• Re: Barbarossa: what were the long-term goals (if any)?
  • From: Rich Rostrom
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Brad Meyer
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: Barbarossa: what were the long-term goals (if any)?
  • From: Daniel Titley
• Re: Chamberlain's role in Norway debacle
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Reparations (was Chamberlain's role in Norway debacle)
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Andrew Clark
• Re: Europe vs Pacific
  • From: Bob Martin
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Barbarossa: what were the long-term goals (if any)?
  • From: Louis C
• Re: John Costello: Germany/Japan and Siberia
  • From: Louis C
• Re: Europe vs Pacific
  • From: Louis C
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: Churchill's attitude towards Australia
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: IJN and Pearl Harbor: oil fields were left intact?
  • From: Geoffrey Sinclair
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Posting Guidelines
  • From: Stephen Graham
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Dave Smith
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Ian MacLure
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: nightjar
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Richard Macdonald
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: German small arms: who had what?
  • From: Bill Shatzer
• Re: Britain with 20 tanks and 100 arty in 1940??
  • From: Andrew Clark

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Soc  > soc.history.war.world-war-ii  > 2007-06