Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- From: "L2007" <removemebayremovemecity@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 11:40:37 -0500
"Chris Manteuffel" <spamtrap@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:1170304694.275359.103860@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Brazil has Minas Gerais (ex- Vengeance). I believe she is the only RN
carrier that served during the war that has not yet been made into
razor blades.
A surprisingly large number of British carriers were started during
the war but not completed until after the war. These are not
technically WW2 carriers, but are very similar to them (only better).
Of those, a number still exist today. China has ex-HMAS Melbourne
(rumor has it she is to be a casino). India's Vikrant (ex-Hercules) is
to be a museum. India's Viraat (ex-Hermes) is still in service.
Those throwaway British carriers were very good designs. Nearly all counties who operated carriers post WW2 used ex British carriers at some point. France, Holland, Argentina, Brazil, Australia, India. I'm not sure if Canada did too.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- From: Louis C
- Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- From: Ian Basham
- Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- References:
- Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- From: L2007
- Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- Prev by Date: Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- Next by Date: German food supplies
- Previous by thread: Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- Next by thread: Re: Monetary costs of German weapons
- Index(es):