Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: "Joe Osman" <Joseph.Osman@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:58:07 -0500
Scott M. Kozel wrote:
<snip>
The original plan with the B-17 when it was built in 1935, was for<snip>
defensive purposes to protect the U.S. coast from attack by enemy
warships, to fly missions from the U.S. and to bomb enemy warships from
high altitude. Obviously it wasn't needed in that role and was mainly
used for bombing enemy land targets.
The USAAC wanted the B-17 for strategic bombing but would have no
chance at all of getting any if they told Congress of their intentions.
They had to cast it in a defensive mold to get funding. If the
defensive purpose was really true, they would have taken more care in
navigation, which was very poor in the USAAF at the beginning of the
war.
It certainly was needed in that role on December 7, 1941 when the USAAF
was responsible for the defense of the Hawaiian Islands from aerial
attack.
Joe
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: Scott M. Kozel
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- References:
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: pbromaghin
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: edward ohare
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: Bill Shatzer
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: edward ohare
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: Dave Smith
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: Brad Meyer
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- From: Scott M. Kozel
- Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- Prev by Date: Re: Optimal rate of fire.
- Next by Date: Re: Fw: Optimal rate of fire.
- Previous by thread: Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- Next by thread: Re: Did Japanese navy have to call off Midway landing?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|