Re: Historically Inaccurate Fiction
- From: "Andrew Clark" <aclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 27 Jul 2005 15:46:21 +0000 (UTC)
"Don Phillipson" <dphillipson@xxxxxx> wrote
> German centimetric (high frequency, high
> accuracy) appears to have been better in
> quality than the British...
The Wuerzburg GCI radar used from 1940-45 was a decimetric,
not centimetric radar: it operated on a wave length of 50-53
cm. It was roughly equivalent in performance to the British
type 11 GCI, introduced 1942. The British Type 13, developed
1942 but not deployed operationally until 1944, was a 3 cm
centrimetric GCI radar of very significantly higher
performance than the Wuerzburg.
> thus enabled ground control of
> night fighters which Britain never
> attempted on the same scale:
Britain had no need for ground control of night fighters on
the same scale as Germany, because Britain had centrimetric
airborne search radar and Germany did not (the Lichtenstein
SN2 was a 200 cm radar). The elaborate nature of the German
night fighter control arrangements was due to German
technological inferiority, not superiority.
> cf. also commando raids on Bruneval
> and other Freya radar units
> to aid British countermeasures.
These raids were much more to discover German capabilities
than to advance British radar technology. The British did
not copy and German radar in WW2, whereas the Germans copied
several British radars including H2S.
> JL is right that, regardless
> of technical quality, the British organized
> radar better, cf. the Fighter Command
> control system of 1940.
Not quite. Britain organised its air defences better then
Germany in 1940. By 1942, the Germans had caught up in
purely organisational terms.
> Notoriously, Germans attempted in the summer
> of 1939 to assess British radar research by
> sending an airship (Zeppelin type) up the
> east coast off Bawdsey, first site of TRE.
> It appears that for no particular reason
> Bawdsey was not transmitting when the
> unseen airship was near
> enough, thus frustrating the mission.
No. The British happily tracked the airship on CH, but the
Germans were trying to detect the wrong frequencies and got
nothing in return.
>
> Don Phillipson
> Carlsbad Springs
> (Ottawa, Canada)
> Don Phillipson
> Carlsbad Springs
> (Ottawa, Canada)
> --
>
--
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Historically Inaccurate Fiction
- From: Spiv
- Re: Historically Inaccurate Fiction
- References:
- Re: Historically Inaccurate Fiction
- From: Don Phillipson
- Re: Historically Inaccurate Fiction
- Prev by Date: Re: Question re Colditz
- Next by Date: Re: documented battles between russia and japan
- Previous by thread: Re: Historically Inaccurate Fiction
- Next by thread: Re: Historically Inaccurate Fiction
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|