Re: The British Army and the rifle
- From: "JTV" <minel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 15:50:45 +0200
<ibm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1123028764.609468.191630@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> I believe much of the British Army ( but not all ) was rifle equipped
> by the start
> of the Crimean War. The Royal Marines however were still using
> smoothbores
> at least in the early stages of that conflict IIRC.
> Breechloaders ( Snider-Enfields IIRC ) came along sometime near the end
> of the War of Northern Agression here in the US.
> At Isandlwhana during the Zulu War of 1879 the Brits were still using
> single shot
> weapons.
And in the Sudan campaign 1884-85, too.
The magazine rifles started coming along shortly after that
> (1885?).
> I'm going from memory so the dates should be regarded as approximate.
>
> IBM
>
Weren't the single-shot breach loaders also the main armament (on both
sides) in Sudan campaign 1896-98? (Of course, I'm talking about the Egyptian
Army, not British.)
JTV
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The British Army and the rifle
- From: Ian MacLure
- Re: The British Army and the rifle
- Prev by Date: Re: POLES: VICTIMS OF THE GERMAN "NAZI" ERA
- Next by Date: Re: The British Army and the rifle
- Previous by thread: Re: The British Army and the rifle
- Next by thread: Re: The British Army and the rifle
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|