Re: branches of science
- From: j.wilkins1@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins)
- Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:13:46 +1000
Martin <mgcqso@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Nov 25, 11:14 pm, j.wilki...@xxxxxxxxx (John Wilkins) wrote:
I suspect that the best visualisation would be a cyclic directed graph.
That is, allow reticulation but make the arrow of time the key.
--
John, I have to admit that I don't quite understand this. Can you
refer me to an example?
This looks good:
http://www.cs.mcgill.ca/~cs251/OldCourses/1997/topic30/
--
John S. Wilkins, Postdoctoral Research Fellow, Philosophy
University of Queensland - Blog: scienceblogs.com/evolvingthoughts
"He used... sarcasm. He knew all the tricks, dramatic irony, metaphor,
bathos, puns, parody, litotes and... satire. He was vicious."
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: branches of science
- From: Martin
- Re: branches of science
- References:
- branches of science
- From: Martin
- Re: branches of science
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: branches of science
- From: Robert Grumbine
- Re: branches of science
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: branches of science
- From: Martin
- Re: branches of science
- From: John Wilkins
- Re: branches of science
- From: Martin
- branches of science
- Prev by Date: Re: branches of science
- Next by Date: Re: Linguistic roots Re: branches of science
- Previous by thread: Re: branches of science
- Next by thread: Re: branches of science
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|