Re: Walter Goffart on Continuity of Roman Taxation Systems

Curt Emanuel <cemanuel@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Pete Barrett" <petebarrett@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4af0872a.5558500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 03:48:25 +0000 (UTC), Paul J Gans <gans@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:


No, just enlarge on it a bit. Do you mean one man's service to
another (fealty) or do you mean property tenure, or the social
hierarchy, etc., etc., etc. Or are you referring to knighthood?

And what development in France are you talking about?

I haven't read the article, but from Curt Emanuel's description,
Goffart seems to be talking mainly about the taxation and land
valuation systems. In that case, that's what's relevant - if similar
systems developed in non-Roman areas, then that would weigh against
the idea that those systems developed in Merovingian and Carolingian
France from Roman practice in Gaul.


Not necessarily - if the Merovingians or Carolingians controlled non-Roman
lands then their applying common administrative systems to those non-Roman
lands shouldn't come as a surprise. You might be able to draw some
conclusions from resistance, or even lowered efficiency indicating
unfamiliarity with a practice but as far as I know we don't have that.

Pretty tough to _prove_ that something didn't happen anyway. I prefer to
look at any issue from the POV of "Is there sufficient evidence to indicate
that something _did_ happen." IMO Goffart's pretty weak on the evidence in
this article. I think his thesis is questionable on that basis alone - at
least based on what I know of the period in question. Of course there may be
some evidence I'm not aware of.

I tend to agree with you, but with a caveat. When there is little
or no evidence, the best that one can do is to try to decide how
a society got from there to here.

In other words, we know (roughly) the system used by the Carolingians.
Where did it come from? The Romans are perhaps the best bet. But
I agree that this is not proof.

--
--- Paul J. Gans
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Walter Goffart on Continuity of Roman Taxation Systems
    ... systems developed in non-Roman areas, ... France from Roman practice in Gaul. ... lands then their applying common administrative systems to those non-Roman lands shouldn't come as a surprise. ... IMO Goffart's pretty weak on the evidence in this article. ...
    (soc.history.medieval)
  • Re: Mummies found in Outer Hebrides: Kings of Ireland
    ... De Danann LANDS, ... and who _was_ writing down the Creation story ... Because there is _no_, repeat, NO evidence that it was written before ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Walter Goffart on Continuity of Roman Taxation Systems
    ... lands shouldn't come as a surprise. ... look at any issue from the POV of "Is there sufficient evidence to indicate ... The Hide was used in much the same way in England but I haven't read anything saying that's based on Roman taxation systems. ... IMO, without any evidence of continuity the best bet is the Carolingians were smart enough to figure it out on their own, just like the English of the same period were. ...
    (soc.history.medieval)
  • Re: Mummies found in Outer Hebrides: Kings of Ireland
    ... De Danann LANDS, ... Not to mention that there's no evidence that such peoples even existed ... Relying on myths and assuming connections that have not been ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)