Re: Part VI - The most modern view on Christianity (forgeries, X-rated gospels, etc.) :-)
- From: am05@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:31:04 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 9, 5:39 pm, erilar <dra...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article
<1c767aed-f10e-4cf3-8e9a-490191f58...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
a...@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
[22] It works as following: the Templars -> pyramide schema -> free
masons -> US -> look at $1 bill (unfinished pyramid indicates that the
Templars had been exterminated before they managed to complete their
operation).
[23] There is a certain amount of confusion related to execution.
Traditionally, it was assumed that leaders of the Templars had been
burned at stake in Paris. However, History According to Dan Brown
tells us that their ashes had been thrown into the Tiber. Taking into
an account that Dan Brown is NOT to be questioned, we have a number of
the workable options: (a) Œtraditional¹ accounts confused Paris with
Rome, (b) at the time in question Tiber WAS flowing through Paris and
later changed its course (perhaps due to a global warming of something
else), (c) Sienna was named ŒTiber¹ in XIV century and then renamed to
avoid geographic confusion, (d) the Templars had been fried in Paris
(which explains ŒFrench fries¹) and then their ashes had been carried
to Rome to be thrown to the Tiber. Sometimes, dealing with the
mysteries of the history can be quite frustrating.
[24] With the same excuse as in [17]
Particularly interesting section here, since I recently read a whole
book about them(a Christmas present) and also more about them in another
book as well. Personally, I find Dan Brown's geographic sense sadly
lacking.
As if his other senses do not! The whole book is a total and complete
idiocy from beginning to end with enormous number of geographical,
historical and other lapses. Not to mention that the whole premise is
moronic: OK, there is a woman who claims to be descendant of JC. What
would be a public reaction (outside psychiatric community)? "So what?"
Ignoring him would really simplify things. . .
BUt, as far as The Most Modern History is involved, he is a valuable
source of 'information'.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: Armour shows how Henry VIII grew into an 'absolute monster'
- Next by Date: Saint Joan of Arc on 9-27-92
- Previous by thread: Re: Part VI - The most modern view on Christianity (forgeries, X-rated gospels, etc.) :-)
- Next by thread: Re: Part VI - The most modern view on Christianity (forgeries, X-rated gospels, etc.) :-)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
