Re: Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- From: Jack Linthicum <jacklinthicum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:01:23 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 16, 12:40 pm, "a425couple" <a425cou...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
tryhttp://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23073963/
Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
OK, obviously I'm at least momentarily having a
gray matter disconect. Anyone care to help me out?
At Columbus time, enough learned people had done
their observations and knew the world/earth was round,
and their math correctly and knew it's size.
So he had the book, and good enough solid astro/math info
to know of eclipses ahead of time, -----
How could Columbus still been of the mistaken
belief he had reached the far east????
(when he only 1/2 way there?)
(i.e. if the math is good for one -shouldn't it be
good for both aspects?)
Mayhap he lied to get the gig. But Samuel Eliot Morrison says he had
two opportunities to get his longitude through known eclipse times and
an almanac and "muffed" both, as did everybody else for a century.
Example, in 1541 there was a mighty effort to determine the longitude
of Mexico City, the derived location was 120 degrees 38 minutes west
of Toledo an error of more than 25 degrees. Correct 95 12.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- From: a425couple
- Re: Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- References:
- Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- From: a425couple
- Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- Prev by Date: Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- Next by Date: Re: Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- Previous by thread: Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- Next by thread: Re: Columbus, eclipse, Regiomontanus
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading