Anglo-Saxon women
- From: stacylightfoot@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 1 Mar 2006 18:53:59 -0800
I know the Anglo-Saxons have been getting a lot of attention at SHM
lately, so sorry to add to the pile. However, I've been curious to
know what all of you think about the actual status of Anglo-Saxon
women. I've read recent articles/essays/books in which authors declare
that Anglo-Saxon women had many rights...more than the women after the
Conquest. However,
from some of the contemporary sources (and I'm not going to bother
quoting tonight) I've read, I find it a little hard to believe. A bit
idealistic I'd say. In the text on Edward the Confessor's life (I
think called "Vita Edwardi"--excuse my mistakes, I'm sleepy), there are
references to his wife Edith always sitting at his feet, and this seems
to be a praisworthy thing. Also, I clearly recall reading that women
were not allowed to talk in Church. Similarly, women are often
referred as "adornments" or "ornaments"--just decorations for men.
I guess what I'm getting at is this: did Anglo-Saxon women really have
all that many rights equal to men? We all know that they could own and
sell land, but other than that, wasn't this just a really patriachal
society?
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Anglo-Saxon women
- From: Larry Swain
- Re: Anglo-Saxon women
- From: Paul J Gans
- Re: Anglo-Saxon women
- Prev by Date: Re: The King's Crapion
- Next by Date: Re: The Da Vinci Code
- Previous by thread: Re: The King's Crapion
- Next by thread: Re: Anglo-Saxon women
- Index(es):