Re: SHM stats for January
- From: Paul J Gans <gans@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:50:34 +0000 (UTC)
Peter Alaca <P.Alaca@xxxxxx> wrote:
Paul J Gans wrote: ds3bf2$cl2$10@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
Kathy <kathy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1139024031.670906.73700@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Z.A. <zeba44@xxxxxxxxx> writes
snip of interesting list - didn't realise we had managed to cover so
Actual medieval topics discussed in January at SHM:
much [no doubt due to not reading all of them]
C.S.A. Secession In 1861
I know some areas of southern USA are considered to be a bit backward
looking, but can we really class this as medieval? :-}
No.
Nor can we class the Kensington Rune Stone stuff as "medieval
history", though we can certainly journey over to sci.archaeology
and argue it.
---- Paul J. Gans
The KRS is medieval speculation with a lot of
(misunderstood and misinterpreted) history,
and for some with a social function.
That is shm, isn't it?
No. We deal only in authenticated facts, not with legends
shown to be non-factual over and over again. The fact that
there is a drawing of the Kensington Rune Stone on the Vinland
Map notwithstanding, it is an absolute fact that the KRS is
not an absolute fact.
And that's a fact.
----- Paul J. Gans
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: SHM stats for January
- From: JJS
- Re: SHM stats for January
- References:
- SHM stats for January
- From: Julian Richards
- Re: SHM stats for January
- From: Ian Dalziel
- Re: SHM stats for January
- From: Renia
- Re: SHM stats for January
- From: Z.A.
- Re: SHM stats for January
- From: Kathy
- Re: SHM stats for January
- From: Paul J Gans
- Re: SHM stats for January
- From: Peter Alaca
- SHM stats for January
- Prev by Date: Re: Greek Fire
- Next by Date: Re: Greek Fire
- Previous by thread: Re: SHM stats for January
- Next by thread: Re: SHM stats for January
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|