Re: Greek Fire
- From: Rémi Moyen <r.moyen+news@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:39:29 +0100
William Black a écrit :
Greek Fire has a number of well known characteristics:
As it was mentionned before, some of them may be invented by the various authors. And I'm a bit perplexed bit this one:
Can be projected by siphon or catapult type device
To me, that seems contradictory in itself. "Projected by siphon" makes me think of a sort of liquid, or at least something of low viscosity (in order to go through some kind of pipe), whereas "projected by a catapult" evokes more something of high viscosity, maybe not solid but certainly not as fluid as water (it seems to me quite difficult to project liquid in a catapult-like mechanism without having drops falling outside -- and that certainly was the last thing the greeks would have wanted!).
I'm I wrong?
Or were these catapults projecting some kind of "bombs" filled with the fire?
--
Rémi Moyen
.
- References:
- Re: Greek Fire
- From: Paul J Gans
- Re: Greek Fire
- From: Renia
- Re: Greek Fire
- From: Paul J Gans
- Re: Greek Fire
- From: erilar
- Re: Greek Fire
- From: Paul J Gans
- Re: Greek Fire
- From: rayadaps
- Re: Greek Fire
- From: William Black
- Re: Greek Fire
- Prev by Date: Sparhavoc was innocent ?
- Next by Date: Re: King Canute
- Previous by thread: Re: Greek Fire
- Next by thread: Re: Greek Fire
- Index(es):