Re: 'Best ancient history book after the Bible' (WorldNet Daily)
- From: Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 04 Sep 2008 21:30:20 -0400
VtSkier wrote:
admin@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:http://www.ng2000.com/fw.php?tp=ancient-history
It has been called "the best ancient history book after the Bible."
For generations, the only way to read it was in Latin. But, in one of
the most significant publishing events of the 21st century, James Ussher's colossal history of the world, titled "Annals of the World" is now available from WorldNetDaily's online store – in English – after over 300 years of being accessible only to scholars.
Wasn't it James Ussher the dude who gave us
Oct. <somethingorother> 4004 BC as the date
for the creation?
'nuff said. Except maybe that the comparison
as a history book is to the Bible.
It lost me at "the best ancient history book after the Bible." Its even worse than the ahistorical, useless bible.
--
If the country had known in 1996 that Hilary was really running the White
House Bill would not have been re-elected.
-- The Iron Webmaster, 4026
http://www.giwersworld.org/disinfo/occupied-2.phtml a6
.
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: 'Best ancient history book after the Bible' (WorldNet Daily)
- Next by Date: Re: 'Best ancient history book after the Bible' (WorldNet Daily)
- Previous by thread: Re: 'Best ancient history book after the Bible' (WorldNet Daily)
- Next by thread: Re: 'Best ancient history book after the Bible' (WorldNet Daily)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
