Re: The Merneptah farce



Dragonblaze wrote:
On May 23, 7:05 pm, Italo <ola...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Dragonblaze wrote:


[snip]


And then there is uru- in 'Urusalim'.
I wonder if such loans may've arrived via Amorite.
Amorite nomads seem to've been in south Mesopotamia already
at the start of the 2nd millennium.


Uru in that is how the Cuneiform text would have tried to deal with
jeru-. The other option would have been i-e-eru-sa-li-im-mu, which is
more diffiult to write in cuneiform.

Dragomblaze

In the execration texts the name also has no initial j-,
"3wš3mm" (rushalimim?).




.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: The Merneptah farce
    ... Amorite nomads seem to've been in south Mesopotamia already ... at the start of the 2nd millennium. ... Uru in that is how the Cuneiform text would have tried to deal with ... more diffiult to write in cuneiform. ...
    (soc.history.ancient)
  • Re: The Merneptah farce
    ... the Sumerian E.GAL through the Akkadian ekallu, ... I wonder if such loans may've arrived via Amorite. ... Amorite nomads seem to've been in south Mesopotamia already ...
    (soc.history.ancient)