Iran: Aryanism to Pan Turkism
- From: oslonor <oslonordic@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 21:28:14 -0800 (PST)
Iran: From Aryanism to Pan Turkism
The following article "Iran and Azerbaijani Language" published in
nationmaster.com is an important article that presents the views and
the dilemas of Azeri Turk leadership of Iranian government.
According to the University of Michigan website the Turkish languages
are classified according to this scheme: The Turkic languages,
belonging to the Altaic language family, may be classified into four
groupings linguistically and geographically:
* I. Northwestern (Kipchak)
* Bashkir, Crimean Tatar, Karachay-Balkar, Karaim,
* Karakalpak, Kazakh, Kazan Tatar, Kumyk, Nogai.
*
* II. Northeastern (Siberian) group
* Altai, Kyrgyz, Khakass, Shor, Tofa, Tuvanian, Yakut, Yellow
Uighur.
*
* III. Southwestern (Oghuz) group:
* Azerbaijani, Gagauz, Turkish, Turkmen.
*
* IV. Southeastern (Chagatai) group:
* Salar, Uighur, Uzbek.
*
* V. Chuvash.
In other words Azeri and Anatolian Turkish are in the same category
and they belong to Oghuz Turk languages. Oghuz Turks came to Iran
between 11 and 15 century and settled in Azerbaijan. Any theory about
Azeris in Azerbaijan should address these facts. As we will see how
the Azeri Turk author of the article avoids these realities and
creates an imaginary history for Azeris and suggests solutions that
only shows the primitive nature of Azeri Turk ruling elite in Tehran.
On the question of Azeri turk ethnic group in Iran the regime faces
the following dilema with different policy implications which has
entirely different consequences for the ruling class and their
relation with the general population in Iran.
Azeris as "Turkified Aryan Iranians"
First option is to continue the polices of Shah's regime as they have
done for the last 27 years and call Azeri turks for "Turkified Aryan
Iranians" who are allegedly been turkified by Oghuz Turks from 11
century to the 15 century. That is Azeris are "Iranians" who have lost
their language and adopted Turkish language because of Oghuz Turks
invasion of Iran. Some Azeris are under strong influence of this
theory. Those Azeris think if they refuse to speak in Azeri language
or foget the Azeri language, they will be "de-turkified" and "turn
into Persians". That is the case with some Azeris that live mostly in
Tehran. This option will lead to a stronger protest movement in
Azerbaijan for ethnic and cultural rights and can generate momentum
for an independent Azerbaijan State which can form a union with The
Republic of Azerbaijan and even Turkey.
Azeris as Turks
Second Option is to recognize Azeris in Iran as a turkish ethnic group
who have a turkish origin and are not related to the natives of Iran
who have non-turkish origins. In other words "Azeris are really turks
and nobody has forced them to speak Azeri Turkish language". Related
to this option is to recognize Azeri Turk language as an official
language and granting full ethnic rights to Azeri Turks. In short term
this option will go half way to meet the demands of Azeri Turks in
Azerbaijan and it may strenghten the regime in Tehran on a short term
basis. But the long term effects of this option will generate a lot of
complications which regime will not be able to solve and speed up the
down fall of the regime in Tehran.
The long term consequences of this option are the following: If Azeri
Turk language is recognized as an official language of Iran then
demands will be raised from Azeris that Azeri language should be used
all over Iran by the government administration. In other words Iran
would be declared a bilingual country where all documnets should be
produced in both languages. This is similar to European countries
where they have two languages as the official language.
Next there would be a demand for population census to see which
language speakers are the majority. Azeri Turks state that Azeris are
a majority of the population of Iran that is Azeris are the biggest
ethnic minority in Iran which is a correct statement. Then according
to rules of democracy Azeri Turk language will be the primary official
language of Iran. Just to make sure Azeri Turks are the majority of
Iran, there can be a union of The Repbulic of Azerbaijan in the north
with Iran and that would gaurantee such a majority.
Persia and Persians as a Myth
Next step would be to degrade the Persian history and civilization as
some mythical and remote historical event which is not really related
to the current realities of Iran and Azeri Turk history and
civilization as the real driving force of Iran. This policy is
actually already pursued by many western publications and media which
dismiss Persia as a comic story. The movie "300" is a good example of
this policy.
Iranians as Turks
Also the existence of Persians in Iran is denied and Persians are
called "Iranians" which are of a different race and ethnicity from the
ancient Persians. "Iranians" are regarded as turks by some western
institutions such as University of Chicago which has produced genetic
charts "showing Iranians" to be related to Anatolian turks and the The
Republic of Azerbaijan in Caucasus. Actually there is no "Iranian
ethnicity" in Iran as it is claimed by these "research institutions".
"Iranian" simply means the citizens of Iran and has no racial, ethnic
or historical significance.
On the other side these policies would generate a counter force by the
natives of Iran and will lead to stronger ethnic identity and
opposition to the current pan turkist regime. That is why the regime
in Tehran has made a lot of noise about "Persian Empire" and "Persian
ancient history" to channel these forces into regime's proper
political channels in order to control these forces. It also tries to
present the pan turk regime in Tehran as a "Persian Chauvinist"
regime!!!! That would strengthen the "Iranian" cover of this pan turk
regime making it easier to carry out their pan turkish policies.
Are Azeris "Iranians"??"
Azeris try to attach themselves to the natives of Iran anyway they can
to maintain state power. So they have invented something called
"Iranian Race". Azeris call themselves "Iranians"!! To the natives of
Iran "Iranian" means a citizen of Iran regardless of ethnicity. That
is an Iranians could be persian, Azeri Turk, Arab, Jew, Assyrian,
Turcoman or anybody else. To Azeri Turks "Iranian" means a race which
they imagine they are members of this "Iranians Race". They include
some natives of Iran in this race and exclude others such as Jews and
Assyrians and Arabs.
There is no "Iranian Race" or ethnicity in Iran. So Azeris add Shia
Islam religion to the definition of this race. That is because Azeris
have Shia religion then they are members of "Iranian Race". Actually
religion is not related to ethnicity as there are both Suni Kurds and
Shia Kurds. But all of them are Kurds.
In addition very few care about Shia or Sunni religion in the whole
region. The only one who cares about religion is US who wants to
ignite religous war in Iraq in order to control all sides and act as
an intermediary between "Shia and Sunni " Iraqis.
Also natives of Iran have been Zoarastrians for thousands of years and
Shia Islam religion was forced on the natives of Iran in 15 century
A.D. by an Azeri Turk dynasty called Saffavids. Superficially the
natives of Iran are Shia moslems but in reality they have kept all
their Zoarastrians culture and traditions such as Nowrous (the new
year) , Zoarastrian Solar Year system and many other Zoarastrian
traditions. The only ones who are really fanatic Shia Moslems in Iran
are Azeri Turks themselves who do not have a Zoarastrian culture. The
Azeri Pan Turks in power in Iran tried to illegalize all Zoarastrian
traditions and even forbid the Nowrooz celebarations but failed to
impose it on the natives of Iran.
Another component of Azeri Turk "Iranian Race Theory" is anti-Arabism.
Azeri Turks look very different from the natives of Iran. So Azeri
Turks promote the propoganda that the natives of Iran are "mixed up
with arabs". This way Azeri Turks can present themselves as "Persians
who are mixed with Arabs"!!!. The reality is Arabs have gene marker
EU10 Haplogroup and nobody in Iran has this genemarker except for some
few arabs in Khuzestan!!!! So the whole Azeri Turk "Iranian Race
Theory" collapses under careful examinations.
Also comparing Arabs in Khuzestan with Azeri Turks, Arabs in Khuzestan
province are thousand times more native and indigenous to Iran than
the Alien Azeri Turk tribes from Caucasus.
The last component of Azeri Turk ideology is to present Turks as
mongols and presenting themselves as "Caucasian Iranians". The reality
is mongols are not turks and their language belongs to a different
class. Azeri Turk language is not related directly to mongolian
languages. That clears and refutes any theory about the "Turkification
of Azeri Turks" by mongols. Azeri Turks are the real Turks.
Do Azeris look like "Persians"?
Azeris claim that they look like Persians and it is not possible to
tell the difference between an Azeri and a "Persian".
The reality is something very different. Firstly "Persians" are not a
homogenous group. Persians in Iran have different origin. Some are
related to the civilization in Mesopotemia. Some Persians are related
to local civilizations such as Elam, Kashan, Jiroft etc. Some Persians
have Aryan origin such as Parthian, Bactrian, Sogdian and Original
Persians in Pars province and Khorasan. The persians with Aryan origin
is only about %10 of the population. But all these persians share
common culture, Zoarastrian religion, Persian language, Persian
history and civilization and even to some extent ethnicity with each
other. Persians are also closely related to Baluchs and Kurds.
Azeris claim they look like "Persians" and point to Tehran as a
"Persian City" where both Azeris and Persians live. Also Azeri Turks
claim there is a lot of inter-marriage between Persians and Azeri
Turks in Tehran and also Azeri Turks are astonished to see some people
speak Azeri language in Tehran.
The reality is something entirely different. %70-%80 of Tehran are
Azeri Turks. There is a lot of inter-marriage between Azeri Turks and
other Azeri Turks in Tehran and also Azeri Turks are very similar to
other Azeri Turks. Some Azeri Turks claim they are "Persians" and some
admit that they are Azeri Turks. So it gives the impression that Azeri
Turks look like "Persians".
Azeri Turks mostly hide their origin and state Persian cities as their
origin. Azeri turks claim they are from Mashhad, Shiraz, Caspian
Region or they are Lurs. For an outsider who does not even know how a
Persian look like, it is very easy to believe Azeri Turks look like
Persians.
Also the Azeri Turk regime inTehran tries to confuse people about
Azeri identity and phenotypes. The Azeri turk regime strongly promotes
Gogoosh, a Persian singer, as a "typical azeri turk". Gogoosh is an
ethnic persian whose family has lived in Caucasus and that is why she
can speak Azeri language. But she has always stressed in all her
interviews that she is not Azeri but ethnically a Persian. After
receiving bags of money from the regime, she has changed her view and
now Gogoosh claims she is Azeri Turk.!!!!
Strangely the other "Azeri Turk" promoted by regime is Farah Pahlavi,
the Shah's wife. Although the Shah himself was related to Azeris,
Farah Pahlavi is an ethnic Persian from Mazandaran province in the
caspian region. Farah Pahlavi has a typical persian phenotype, speaks
with a Persian accent and not an Azeri Turk accent, and displays a
Persian culture in her speech and manners. Even if Azeris may change
their face with plastic surgery and learn to speak Persian with a
Persian accent, to change the culture and manner of speech related to
Persians is an impossibility for Azeri Turks as Persian Culture can
not be learned in 6 months even if somebody can learn American culture
in 6 months. It takes thousands of years to learn Persian culture and
it is a barrier that can not be overcome by Azeri Turks.
Slideshow: Phenotypes
Persians
Iranians (Azeri Turks)
Afghans
Azeris and Oghuz Turks
If Azeris are descedants of Oghuz Turks and they are really turks,
then what happened to original inhabitants of Azerbaijan region in
Western Iran. It can lead to only one conclusion that is those people
have been murdered by the immigranting Oghuz Turks or driven away from
these regions such as Kurds who were exiled in million to northern
Khorasan. To claim "intermarriage" between Azeri Turks and
"Medes"!!!!! who had disappeared thousand years before 11 century
would lead back to "Iranian Aryan Azeri" theory which was promoted by
"Persian Chauvinist" such as Kasravi!!!! who was actually an Azeri
himself!!!!! The murder and exile of Kurds from this region is really
what happened but it is not politically expedient for the ruling
regime in Tehran to accept.
Azeris as "Original Inhabitants of Iran"
So the article tries to find another solution. That is to claims Azeri
Turks were original inhabitants of Azerbaijan since ancient times or
Azeris have been in Azerbaijan for 8000 years as some pan turks claim.
And Azeri Turks have been speaking Azeri Turk language in this region
since ancient times. But Azeri Turks are only related to Azeris in
Caucasus only and they have nothing to do with anatolian turks who
speak a very closely related turkish language and who also originate
from Oghuz turks. So according to the author there was a China wall
between Iran and Ottoman Turkey and Oghuz turks could not enter Iran.
They only went to Turkey!!!!! Oghuz Turks probably recieved only
transit visas to pass through Iran to reach Turkey!!!!
Subsequently the author creates some mythical "Persian Chauvanist" who
have claimed some dialects of Persian Pahlavali called "Ancient Azari"
language was spoken in this area before Oghuz Turks came and rejects
these claims. In reality whatever language was spoken in this region
by native tribes such as Kurds and others, those people are either
dead or have been driven away from the area by the Oghuz Turks and
there is no dispute with the author that those people do not live in
this region anymore. But the author claims Azeri Turks did not
originate from Oghuz Turks but are Turks native to Iran since ancient
time!!!!
Azeri Racial Nationalism
The whole issue of language is actually very minor issue as what the
author is going to suggest next. The author introduces two keywords in
his article that has a great significance. These keywords are
"mingling" and "inter-marriage". When the readers thought the Azeri
Turk elite has given up on "Azeri Iranian Aryans" theory, you can see
that it is introduced back into the new theory.
"Unity of Turks" or Pan Turkism Azeri Style
The author starts talking about unity of Turks. One would imagine that
the author means the unity of Azeris in Iran and Northern Azeris in
Caucasus. But the reader is completely wrong. The author is not
interested in Azeris in the Republic of Azerbaijan. Next one think of
unity with Turcomans who live in Khorasan. No!!!! The author is not
interested in Turcomans either. Is the author may be by any chance
interested in the unity with the Anatolian Turks. No!!!! Do not even
mention it.!!! The author is only very interested in some un-named
turks who live in Khamse!!!!
Quote: "It is generally thought that in the land of Persia, nothing is
spoken but Persian, and few are aware that Turkish is widespread
throughout Iran. It is perhaps even more common than Persian, and many
Iranians themselves, if asked if Turkish is spoken in their country,
would reply, "Sure, in some provinces like Azerbaijan and Khamse,""
Where is Khamse?
Where is this Khamse????? Very few Azeris have heard about Khamse!!!!
Nobody knows where this Khamse is. Who are these Turks who live in
Khamse?? Khamse is a code word for something else. The Qashaqii tribes
in Fars province live in a region called Khamse. But that is very
strange. Qashaqaiis are in no way related to Azeri Turks. Qashqaiis
are combination of Persian and turk tribes who have built a
confederation. They speak a turkish language RELATED to TURCOMANS and
not Azeri language. But ethnically they are not even related to
TURCOMANS. Qashaqiis display mostly Persian phenotypes. In addition to
that Qashqaiis have Persian culture which Azeri Turks do not have. My
Persian wife knows Qashqaiis very well as she has gone to school with
them in Iran.
So why Azeri Turk author is so interested in Khamse???? According to
some sources Qashqaiis actually have Aryan origin and are one of the
purest Iranians. They have almost the same clothing as Bakhtiary
persian tribes. So it is very possible that Qashqaiis have Parthian
origin that is in one of the Persian tribes in North East Iran and
Central Asia.
Why a Persian looking tribe speaks a language related to Turcomans??
It is very logical as Parthians lived in Turcomenstan before Turcomans
migrated there, so Qashqaiis originate from Parthians. Parthians also
established settlements in Pars province even under Parthian Empire.
Bakhtiarys a neighbor tribe to Qashqahiis are direct desdendants of
Parthians and their Persian language has many Parthian words too. So
actually Qashqaiis are not really Turks.
Also the author uses the keywords "mingling" and "inter-marriage". But
Qashqaiis live in Fars province long away from Azeri Turks in Tehran
and Azerbaijan. So what does he means by that???? Does he mean
Qashqaiis have "mingled" and "inter-married" with Azeri Turks over
such a great distance!!!!
Khamse is moved to Tehran!!!
The answer to these puzzles are solved when the Azeri turk author
states that some of them have "migrated" or really have been moved to
Tehran. Now the question is why Qashqaiis should move to Tehran for
jobs when they are sitting next to the biggest oil and gas reserves in
the world in their neighborhood!!!! The answer is "mingling" and
"inter-marriage" with Azeri Turks!!!!
Also note that the Azeri Turk author states that:"As for the other
parts of Iran, the majority of the people there are not Turks, but
there are many among the tribesmen and villagers who are. An exception
is the province of Kerman and the districts of Gilan, Mazandaran,
Kurdestan, Lurestan, etc., in which there are no Turks except those
who have migrated there recently, and they do not consider themselves
to be true residents of these provinces."
Azeri Migration to No-Where???
The question is why these Azeri Turks are migrating to Gilan and
Mazandaran and Kurdestan and Lurestan. These areas have no jobs to
give to Azeri Turks and Azerbaijan has the lowest unemployment rate in
the whole Iran? There has been reports of clashes in Mazandran where a
whole village with their residents were wiped out. The Mazandarani
villagers were either jailed or fled the area. Azeri Turks claimed
that they are building "The University of Amol" in that area!!!!
What the author is telling Azeris is this: Azeris you are turks and
you are no Aryans. You never "mingled" or "inter-mingled" with the
natives of Iran as the structure of a tribe does not permit that in
ancient history. But we are going to correct our mistakes. We control
the state in Iran and we will use the state to "mingle" and "inter-
mingle" with the natives of Iran. We will use the natives as sex
objects so that we become "Aryan Azeri Turks". The author also
constantly refers to turkish language as a "second beautiful wife" as
if they are going to use seeghan or polygamy to achieve their
objectives.
Quote: "Turkish is like a beautiful girl who sits idly beside an
unveiled second wife who enchants the heart with her jewelry and
bewitches the mind with her adornments."
To impress western readers the azeri turk author even grants the title
of Persians to the people of Qazvin and Tehran!!!! He calls Tehran and
Qazvin for Persian cities!!! Just to mention that Tehran is 70-80% are
Azeri Turks. No need to discuss Qazvin!!!
Why the author is making these statements when everybody in Iran knows
that Tehran or Qazvin are actually Azeri Turk cities and not Persian
cities??
Iran as "Melting Pot Nation"
Quote: "Most villages and tribes in the provinces of Khorasan? and
Fars? and the districts of Hamadan and Qazvin and `Eraq? and Astarabad
are Turks, and travelers wandering the streets and alleys of Tehran
have been astonished?? at seeing the villagers walking about speaking
in Turkish. Some of these had migrated from Azerbaijan and Khamse in
recent years and stay in the cities and no longer consider themselves
to be from their land of origin, but from these cities."
"The Turks and Persians in Iran are not like two separate heaps, but
like a chessboard during a game in which each player has penetrated
the other´s ranks and the black pieces have mingled with the white
ones:"
Nobody is astonished that people talk in Azeri Turk language in Tehran
and Qazvin as the majority are Azeri Turks. The reason for these
statements are very simple. The author is trying to convey the
impression to western readers that Iran looks like USA and every city
and every region is mixed up with Azeri Turks which is not correct but
it is an agenda which Azeri Turk regime in Tehran is pursuing.
Also Qashqaiis speaking a turkish language has nothing to do with
Azeri Turks. Qashqaiis are an indigenous people to Fars province both
ethnically and culturally. Azeri Turks are not indigenous to Fars
province. Nobody notices that presence of Qashqaiis in Fars province
as they share the same culture as the rest of people in the province.
But a massive migration of Azeri Turks into Fars province has
disastarous social consequences for the population as they are totally
aliens to that society. That is why Iran is not USA.
The Azeri Turk author also admits the problems they are facing to
carry out their "Azeri Turk Racial Nazi Nationalism" objectives as it
describes Iran as a chessboard where every move by Azeri Turks faces a
counter move by the natives of Iran.This article compeletly exposes
the racial agenda of these Pan Azeri Turk elite in Iran.
Iran is not a "melting pot" nation and is not similar to US. Iran is a
multi ethnic country where different ethnicities have kep their ethnic
identity for thousands of years and which has been the main obstacle
to Azeri Turks gaining total political control in Iran. That is why
Azeri Turks are making a lot of noise about "separatism" and have
murdered many Baluchs, Kurds and Iranian Arabs recently. Also US is
helping Azeri Turks with presenting a lot of theatrical shows and
proving that US is promoting "ethnic separatism in Iran". In reality
US is promoting "The Policy of Turkification of Iran" and
centralization of power in hands of Azeri Turks.
"Beutiful Azeri Turk Iranian Nation"
This is a primitive Azeri Turk elite culture from Caucasus which is
different and incompatible with the history and culture of the natives
of Iran. Their policy was summed up in a concise statement by an Azeri
Turk. He stated: "Iran is not a tribal nation anymore. We are a
beutiful Azeri Turk Iranian nation." And these policies by Azeri Turks
are financed and sponspored by the western backers of Azeri Turks in
Iran for their strategic and economic interest.
Azeri Turks have a right to demand their ethnic and cultural rights.
This is supported by all natives of Iran. At the same time the natives
have a right to demand their ethnic and cultural rights too as the
whole mass media in Iran is dominated by Azeri Turks who are trying to
impose an Azeri Turk culture on the rest of Iran. Because of special
political conditions in Iran, the pan turks in Tehran do not use Azeri
language but use the persian language to promote their objectives.
The Policy of Turkification of Iran
The Policy of Turkification of Iran is also confirmed by other Azeri
Turk writers who promote the Pan Turks in Tehran. Mr. Ben Madadi
writing in Iranian.com also confirms these policies but from the Azeri
Pan Turk regime's viewpoint. Mr. Madadi calls this policy for
"Aryanization of Azeri Turks" by the "Persian Chauvanist regime in
Tehran!!!" who wants to "aryanize Azeri Turks"!!!!!.
Ben Madadi Quote: "And this is where we find the reason behind all
this attempt to Aryanise Azerbaijanis. Taking into account the mass
migration of Azerbaijanis (mostly due to lack of investment!!!!! in
the region) to Tehran and other Persian areas of Iran it is also very
possible that the 24% is no more representative and Azerbaijanis, even
taking into account those who consider themselves Azeris in Tehran and
other non-Azerbaijani areas, may be somewhere below 20% of the total
population."
Mr. Madadi claims that as a consequence of the policy "the
Aryanization of Azeri Turks" the number of Azeris will go down in
IRAN!!!! Fortunetly or unfortunately for Mr. Madadi, we can assure him
that the policy of "Turkification of Iran" will actually increase the
number of Azeri Turks in Iran!!!! This is because of the Laws of
Genetics where the dominant Azeri Turk genes will predominate and
there will be more Azeri Turks in Iran and not less. On the other hand
there will be less of natives of Iran!!!!! I am sorry to tell Mr. Ben
Madadi that the Azeri Turks will never become "Aryans"!!!! Azeri Turks
will remain Azeri Turks!
See also: The The Policy of Turkification of Iran
http://azeriturks.blogspot.com
Pan Turkism and Russia and Turkey
Also Iran as an Azeri Turk country poses a great security risk to
Russia as pan Turkism can be promoted in the whole central asia. This
would change the balance of forces in the region to the favor of US as
opposed to today's situation where Russia is a dominant power in the
region. And this is the reason Azeri Turks are promoted by the US,
both under Clinton and Bush Administrations.
Pan Turkism in Iran is not an ally of the Pan Turks in Turkey as they
have different agenda and objectives. Pan Turkism in Iran does not use
turkish language as its medium for their policies as this is not
feasable because of the political conditions in Iran at present time.
But that may change in near future. It tries to impose its Azeri Turk
culutre on the other people under the banner of "Pan-Iranism". It is
necessary to point out that Azeri Turks in Iran do not have any
"Iranian" or "Persian "culture" as it is evident for the last 27 years
of their rule in Iran.
Also Pan Turkism in Iran has a religious character as opposed to the
anotolian secular version of Pan Turkism. That is why Pan Turkism in
Iran poses even a security risk to Turkey as the Azeris might even try
to impose their own version of Pan Turkism on Turkey. That is why
Turkey is re-considering its alliances and distancing itself from US
and may even form an alliance with Russia to oppose Azeri Pan Turks in
Iran. This is actually what happened at the end of Saffavids dynasty
in 1722 when both Russia and Ottomans together invaded Iran.
Also note by Pan Turkism, we do not mean the people of Azerbaijan who
are demanding their ethnic rights. But we mean Azeri Turks pretending
to be "Iranian Nationalist" and are sitting in Tehran and control the
regime in Iran.
Classes and Ethnicity in Iran
Azeri pan turks claim that the Pan turk regime in Tehran is a class
based regime and it does not represent Azeri Turks. Instead Azeri pan
turks promote "the struggle for democracy and human rights" and try to
impose the ideology of American Liberals who are the real sponsors of
Azeri pan turk regime on Iran. They talk about "pluralism",
"democracy", "diversity", "affirmative action for poor minorities such
as Azeri Turks", "need to spread Azeri Turks all over Iran to achieve
diversity"!!!!!!.
Affirmative action means that "poor oppressed Azeri Turks" should get
the best jobs and education on a priority basis because they are
oppressed by the "Persian Chauvanist regime of Iran"!!!!
Also Azeri Pan Turks will introduce legislation copied from their
American sponsors about "laws against racial and ethnic hatred". That
is if the natives of Iran protest against the Azeri Pan Turk regime
agenda for the natives, they will be called racist and severley
prosecuted for "racial hate crimes"!!!!
The Azeri Pan Turk regime in Tehran has executed 100.000's since 1979.
The ancestors of these Azeri Turks, the Saffavids murdered millions of
Zoarastrians and Kurds and exiled millions of Kurds to North East
Iran. The racial nazi policies of these Azeri Pan Turks such as
"Aryanization of Azeri Turks" as described clearly by Mr. Ben Madadi
in Iranian.com is completely ignored by the American sponsors of these
Azeri Turks. Instead anybody criticising these polices is called
"lunatic racist"!!!!
This ideology is very similar to what American liberals promote for
African Americans in US and it is copied by Azeri Turks in Iran.
It is important to point out that the regime started with a
rudimentary form of class based regime under Ayattollah Khomeini in
1979. But the regime evolved into a complete Azeri Pan Turk tribal
regime ending with Mr. Ahmadinejad. This is confirmed even by most
leading figures inside the regime stating that the regime in Tehran
has no "Persian or Iranian" character.
The reason for this is that Iran is a tribal society and the
"Revolution" in 1979 accentuated these tendencies into tribalism in
Iran. On the subject of "Revolution" I refer to my blog "Islamic
Fundamentalism Made in US".
That is the reason why general slogans for "Democracy and Human
Rights" has no effect on this Azeri Pan Turk regime in Tehran and it
can only be brought down on ethnic lines.
What is needed is a Karim Khan Zand from Lur tribes or Mirwais Khan
Hotak Pashtoon from Kandahar who brought down the ancestor to this
regime, The Saffavids in 1722 historically. And those kind of leaders
are needed today.
Currently Kurds and Baluchs are leading the struggle but once the rest
of natives including Persians join the ranks of Baluchs and Kurds then
the end of regime is near.
Pan Turkism and Democracy
Also the natives of Iran should understand that democracy will not
solve the problem of ethnicities as it would lead to further
turkification of Iran. As we will see later the Azeri ruling elite in
Iran will not permit a separate Persian state and want to hang to
their power and priviliges so they are proposing a different path.
This is the path of "racial azeri turk nationalism" based on the Azeri
Turk Saffavids models which is comparable to Nazism Racial policies by
the Hitler in the modern time. That is to carry out state racial
policies and attempt to change the ethnic composition of the country
for political reasons.
For the natives of Iran it is best not to fall into trap of slogans
for demcoracy as it will only lead to speedy turkification of Iran.
Azeri turks as a majority population will be able to turn Iran into a
turkish state and the rules of democracy will permit that. So what
remains for the natives is to demand is a federal state at the first
stage, and a separate state based on Persian culture and traditions
apart from an Azeri turk state.
"Persian State" and "Azeribaijni State"
Persians should demand democracy for a Persian state and not for a
Turkish state in Iran. We use a "Persian State" as the term "Iranian
State" has been distorted to mean "Azeri Turks". The Persian state is
the primary goal for all natives of Iran regardless of their
ethnicity. Azeri Turks should also build their own state separate from
a Persian state.
Iran: From Aryanism to Pan Turkism
http://aryanpanturks.blogspot.com/
See also: The The Policy of Turkification of Iran
http://azeriturks.blogspot.com
Persians and Hollywood
http://oslonor.blogspot.com
Phenotypes:
Persians
http://community.webshots.com/slideshow/558225427FXexGJ
Azeri Turks
http://community.webshots.com/slideshow/560864563xcrvxL
Afghans
http://www.flickr.com/photos/20363431@N00/sets/72057594116574438/show/
Join our Group on Google Iran-aryan-PanTurkism
http://groups.google.com/group/iran-aryan-panturkism
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Beware The Greeks...Origin Of _O.K._
- Next by Date: Was their a god at Ephesus, male counterpart to the Goddess
- Previous by thread: Re: Beware The Greeks...Origin Of _O.K._
- Next by thread: Was their a god at Ephesus, male counterpart to the Goddess
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
