Re: What is the Blood of Christ? - His death? The wine? Anything spiritual?


"David" <pchristainsen@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:1194563643.673415.6050@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Nov 8, 1:40 am, "Inger E" <inger e.johans...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"David" <pchristain...@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i
meddelandetnews:1194496150.407485.158390@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

The blood of Jesus
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/qumran_origin/message/2971

Thus, Dr. Thiering gives what the Blood of Christ originally meant.

Yet, for modern Christians I suspect most don't clearly know
what it means for them today. Of course, I could be wrong.

"Dr" Thiering once again show lack of skill, or knowledge, of Theories
of
Science. That's bad and it's worse the more she tries to put forward.
Lack
of knowledge of what's valid argumentation and what's not doesn't help
her
case.
That's also bad because small pieces of her thoughts that might have
'something in it' will thus be lost for ever!

Inger E

Your broadside against Dr. Thiering is disproved by -

"The Temple Scroll Courts Governed by Precise Times",
Dead Sea Discoveries 11, 3, 2004, pp. 336-358.

On the contrary. You and 'Dr' Thiering better learn that in the world of
Science skills in understanding and using Theories of Science. You take a
non proven assumption put forward to be used as proving what it's testing
and Your belief that such bad science, bad and invalid argumentation could
prove anything what so ever put up against 'Dr' Thiering only prove my case
that you and 'Dr' Thiering lack needed knowledge in what's valid and what's
invalid arguments in this type of analyses. So bad choice. Really very very
bad choice from your side.

Dead Sea Discoveries is the top professional journal.

Don't agree with you nor does most who studied the Discoveries. But even had
you been true in the 'top professional journal', you still hadn't been able
to put that forward as a valid argument of any type. Only been able to prove
close in time and close in place. Lacking all the analyses needed to prove
that the so called 'top professional journal' show tendency. Which you would
have found had you done a proper study.

That's only part of the needed knowledge, skills and understanding of
Theories of Science. Until you and 'Dr' Thiering learnt and understood the
basic, my statement stands solid.

Inger E



.