Re: Luke no eye witness
- From: alanmc95210@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: 30 Oct 2005 09:08:10 -0800
Iasion wrote:
> Greetings all,
>
> Apologists have claimed Luke was an eye-witness to the Gospel events,
> or perhaps spoke to eye witnesses.
>
>
> The actual passage reads :
>
> "Since many have undertaken
> to compile a narrative
> of the events that have been fulfilled among us,
> just as those who
> were EYEWITNESSES from the beginning and ministers of the word
> have handed them down to us,"
>
> I too have decided,
> after investigating everything accurately anew,
> to write it down in an orderly sequence for you,
> most excellent Theophilus,
> so that you may realize the certainty
> of the teachings you have received."
>
>
(cut) He was not an eyewitness to the events in the gospels, but he
may have been an eyewitness to Paul's evangelizing efforts- A. McIntire
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Luke no eye witness
- From: Matt Giwer
- Re: Luke no eye witness
- From: Martin Edwards
- Re: Luke no eye witness
- References:
- Luke no eye witness
- From: Iasion
- Luke no eye witness
- Prev by Date: Re: Missive of Great Importance
- Next by Date: Re: Luke no eye witness
- Previous by thread: Luke no eye witness
- Next by thread: Re: Luke no eye witness
- Index(es):