Is there a more comprehensive Old Persian lexicon than R.G. Kent's?
- From: zeroNowNoMoreSpammingtype@xxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 16:01:14 +0100
Hi,
I've been trying to decipher an inscription (apparently) in Old
Persian that formed part of a treasure hunt contest some years ago.
While I am pretty sure it is O.P and not any other sort of cuneiform,
I haven't had any luck with R.G. Kent's lexicon. Added to this is the
possibility that the "message" was a red herring.
Does any other lexicon, in particular a more coprehensive lexicon,
exist?
Thanks,
James McLaughlin.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Do we have non Eusebian evidence that there were Christian Churches prior to 312?
- Next by Date: Re: Do we have non Eusebian evidence that there were Christian Churches prior to 312?
- Previous by thread: Do we have non Eusebian evidence that there were Christian Churches prior to 312?
- Next by thread: Re: mounds around the world
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|