Re: The "Sea People" were Greeks


Agamemnon wrote:
> <grapheus@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:1125491948.565275.89430@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >
> > Agamemnon wrote:
> >> "SteveT" <nextbigthing1024@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> news:iobah1l71oscg6alp3q9b9me23bc0renih@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> > On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:06:57 +0100, "Agamemnon"
> >> > <agamemnon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>"SteveT" <nextbigthing1024@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> >> >>news:sm28h15s58b9e10t7krspl793s8po9tt7s@xxxxxxxxxx
> >> >>> On Tue, 30 Aug 2005 03:30:03 +0300, "gogu" <golanule@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >>>
> >> >>>>I don't know much but IIRC they were called "Pelestes" alas the name
> >> >>>>"Palestinians".
> >> >>>>Is it possible that the Palestinians are descendants of those first
> >> >>>>(Hellenic
> >> >>>>?...) colonists ?
> >> >>>>Is there any truth in that ?
> >> >>>>
> >> >>>>tnx
> >> >>>
> >> >>> I remember the term "Peleset", & no doubt there are many ways of
> >> >>> interpretting Egyptian which arrive at different spellings. I' not
> >> >>> sure about "Hellenic", most people seem to describe the incomers as
> >> >>> "Aegean". It also seems that they integrated with the local
> >> >>> population
> >> >>> quite quickly. So my impression is that "Palestinian" might be
> >> >>> derived
> >> >>> from "Peleset", but that the Palestinians probably remain a Canaanite
> >> >>> people who "absorbed" some Aegean immigrants.
> >> >>
> >> >>Rubbish.
> >> >>
> >> >>The Peleset were Pelasgian Greeks and linguistic analyses of their
> >> >>names
> >> >>and
> >> >>inscriptions have proven this.
> >> >>
> >> > What was a Pelasgian Greek? "Pelasgian" being the term most often used
> >> > to describe the pre-Greek inhabitants of the Aegean.
> >>
> >> The Pelasgians were the original inhabitants of Arkadia
> >
> > TOTALLY WRONG !..
>
> Stop reading the science fiction. This fact is totally RIGHT. The Pelasgians
> were the original inhabitants of Arkadia according to ALL historiains.

Historians having NO NOTION of what happened 2000 years before they
lived !.. Historians relying, like you do, on TALES and LEGENDS
deforming the Historical Truth...

>
> >
> >>who were named after
> >> their king Pelasgos who built the first cities there.
> >
> > King "Pelasgos" was not of Arkadian origin. No more than George
> > Washington was an Indian... He was (if he existed!) a Proto-Ionian
> > "conquistador", who founded some "colonial cities" in the Peloponnesos.
> >
>
> POPPY***.
>
> Pelasgos was of Inachid origin. The Ionians are Iapetids.

BALONEY !.. You are relying on LEGENDS and NAMES, of which we know
NOTHING !..

>
> >
> >>Some of them migrated
> >> to Thessaly after the Deukalion flood and from there they migrated to
> >> where
> >> Herodotus says he found them.
> >
> > The "Deukalion flood" probably corresponds to the "Second Collapse" of
> > Thera.
> >
> >> Pelasgian was a dialect of Greek related to Mycenaean Arcado-Cypriot.
> >
> > NO. It was a GREEK dialect, related to Ionic-Attic.
>
> LOL... The Pelasgians came from Arcadia. Their dialect is closer to
> Arcado-Cypriot than to Attic.

HA ! HA ! HA !.. A new CIRCULAR REASONING !.. Why not the following
one : "The inhabitants of the Washington State came from Washington
DC, led by George Washington. So, they speak a dialect close to the
Washingtonian"...

grapheus
> >
> >> After the Trojan War Agapenor the king of the Arkadian Pelasgians
> >> migrated
> >> to Cyprus and it is his Pelasgians that are referred to by Ramses III.
> >>
> >> >
> >> > Steve
> >> >
> >

.

Quantcast