Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: "ie" <I_e,johansson@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 10:18:25 GMT
Alaca and Marian,
I haven't bluffed nor lost the game,
only you two who definitely seems to know how to bluff have lost the game.
Neither of you knows enough about the thing we discuss in older ages nor in
Alaca's case in later.
It's incredible that you Marian tries to join the abusive forces of Alaca's.
Unfortunatly for you that doesn't give you any scholarly credibility. That's
your problem.
As I told you directly here and in private mail I was willing to present a
lot more Prime sources than any of those you seem to have had access to. Not
only Greek and 'European' sources but others who lived with the group Getae,
who traded with them and who also followed the Getae merchandisers up to the
Getae merchandise center on the shore of river Wisla and also over to the
Getae who lived(! that's correct because that's directly said) on the island
in the northern Ocean.
I was willing to help you to sources you don't have, might not have heard of
because I have had some of them from scholars who worked as archaeologists
and historians in Turkey, Irak and Iran. Can't help having had such scholars
among my friends and/or among my daughter's friends' parents. I told you
that I am putting texts together. So I am. I have been discussing with two
scholars only the last 24 hours how to help you to some of the texts. I am
not sure that you are worth spending so many hours on if you can't wait
until you seen what I am ready to help you to and to put forward.
Those who calls themselves scholars and belive to be served on a
silver-plated tray, they are far from reliable scholars. Every true scholar
knows that it takes hard work, a lot of reading, a lot of validating and an
open mind for expecting the unexpected on the way for a subject to be fully
discussed and penetrated. Those who believes they can take quotes out of
context or present this or that because they believe scholar A said
according to their wishes, they better rethink. No matter what they are out
on thin thin ice.
Inger E
"Marian Ionescu" <stud3583o@xxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
news:430ad824$0$66375$dbd4f001@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Alaca wrote:
>
>
> > You bluffed and you have lost the game Inger.
> > Marian has no problems with her hypothesis.
> > You are the one with a problem, because you,
> > as the 'Great Swedish Scholar', are no match
> > for a Romanian student. A student Inger!
>
>
> I am a not a "her"! Have you never heard of the famous
> Marian Oprea and his medal of bronze in Helsinki ?
> He is not a woman !
>
> Marian Oprea
> http://www.ziarulcn.com/article/aid/21611/
>
> Marian I
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: Alaca
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- References:
- Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: Marian Ionescu
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: Alan Crozier
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: Marian Ionescu
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: ie
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: Alaca
- Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- From: Marian Ionescu
- Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- Prev by Date: Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- Next by Date: Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- Previous by thread: Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- Next by thread: Re: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- Index(es):