Re: hype for HBO Rome series
- From: Matt Giwer <jull43@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 04:38:31 GMT
rick++ wrote:
Were starting to see some advance press about the HBO series on Rome starting Aug 28. Details about gaudily painted buildings (true, even the Parthenon was painted) and unisex latrines. I hope this "reality approach" extends to dialog. One of the things that turned me off about the ABC Rome miniseries a couple months ago was the stilted dialog- people talked like a Shakespeare play, etc. Boring! I much more apprecieted the earthiness of the I-Claudius series. HBO Rome could be a prequel to I-Claudius.
It is worth giving a watch for a couple to see it they have something. I'll accept unauthentic if creative as with GB Shaw's Ceasar. It going to be entertainment whatever comes. I do not expect history lessons but authenticity absorbed in an interesting context would be good.
As for the ABC thing, the less the better. Bad plots, bad dialog (regardless of dialect) cliched modern plot gimmicks (and modern misconceptions of ancient ones) and I could only stand one episode. Perhaps I misjudged it.
-- As an American I suggest exhuming Churchill's body and desecrating it. -- The Iron Webmaster, 3479 nizkor http://www.giwersworld.org/nizkook/nizkook.phtml book review http://www.giwersworld.org/israel/willing-executioners.phtml a7 .
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: hype for HBO Rome series
- From: Wylie
- Re: hype for HBO Rome series
- References:
- hype for HBO Rome series
- From: rick++
- hype for HBO Rome series
- Prev by Date: Re: to Markovic differences in British-English and American English grammar
- Next by Date: Getae were not Goths: linguistic evidence
- Previous by thread: Re: hype for HBO Rome series
- Next by thread: Re: hype for HBO Rome series
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|