Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- From: "Raktizer Omheit" <cequka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 12:41:19 +1000
"IEJ" <Inger_ejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:Wq9Fe.29829$d5.182962@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>
> "Raktizer Omheit" <cequka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
> news:42e4b22c_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>> "IEJ" <Inger_ejohansson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>> news:X72Fe.29798$d5.182913@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >
>> > "Raktizer Omheit" <cequka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> skrev i meddelandet
>> > news:42e49620_1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> The reason why Romania in the Balkans, one part of the former Roman
>> > province
>> >> of Dacia [ 106-271 A.D. ], turned out to be a Latin enclave surrounded
> by
>> >> Slavic and Hungarian/Magyar-speaking peoples,
>> >
>> > ? Some say that the Hungarian/Magyar-speaking people arrived 200 years
>> > later. Who am I refering to? Historians from 271 to 750 AD.....
>> > What ground do you have for the 'Hungarian/Magyar-speaking' people
>> > being
>> > there before 271 AD?
>> > References to contemporary sources please.
>> >
>> > Inger E
>> >
>> > I did not write that. Please re-read my first post more carefully.
>
> Sorry. My mistake. I wrote before I had my first cup of coffee for the
> day.
>
> Inger E
>
> You don't really believe that I believe your excuse. You are as mysterious
> to me as a toilet is to a plumber, and as interesting.
>
>
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- From: IEJ
- Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- References:
- Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- From: IEJ
- Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- Prev by Date: Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- Next by Date: Re: Germanicus Caesar and Arminius, A.D.14-17.
- Previous by thread: Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- Next by thread: Re: Roman Dacia and Armorica.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
