Re: So what's your source? ...

Nat--
You're not looking for the truth, you're trying to discredit me.
You're not going to hurt my feelings, because you don't know anything
about me. If you did, I assure you you'd be quite surprised.

Genealogists routinely prove relationships in all sorts of ways. Any
idiot can pick up a will and scan for names. If all you do is search
records, then you're a records searcher.

You've lost face here, but there are worse things than that. I've
told you to check this out with someone you do respect and report your
findings and the source. Like I told Will, I'm not a fact checker for
every theory you want to concoct.

MichaelAnne Guido lied. Her lie is ensconced in the archives of this
group. She hasn't responded, and she probably won't. She won't
because she has no source for "a number of lawsuits." It was just a
fib to conceal the true nature of Elizabeth's "twelve pence." She
knew it was the death-knell for her Katherine Carter line.

No matter what you do, it's not going to change. It's the law. Read
it and weep.

You have no more rights here than anybody else. So don't try to bully
me--it won't work. And I'm going to keep pressing MichaelAnne for her
source until she coughs it up.

Bret or whatever said he was a subject of the Queen. So what?
.