Re: Rudeness
- From: marianne dillow <mdillow31@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 26 Oct 2008 11:19:59 -0700 (PDT)
Trained ?... since when is this person labeled a " good genealogist" ?
I have met better since 1982.
Marianne Dillow
--- On Sun, 10/26/08, Renia <renia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
From: Renia <renia@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>.
Subject: Re: Rudeness
To: gen-medieval@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sunday, October 26, 2008, 10:39 AM
WJhonson@xxxxxxx wrote:
In a message dated 10/25/2008 8:56:52 P.M. PacificDaylight Time,
Roemer222@xxxxxxx writes:admit that you enjoy
Well, Will, you certainly have proved my point. You
putting people down (it makes me wonder how old youare). It's good that
youwriting Gen-Medieval if
are in the minority, but there would be more people
they didn't have to worry about critics like you.Fewer seem to write than
onelike the kind of help
would expect, given that there are so many who would
Gen-Medieval provides. And I already belong to theDAR. >>
-------------------want less.
I am 12.
We don't WANT more people writing in Gen-Med. We
Why do you want fewer people writing here, Will? Do you
just want to
write to yourself? Is that your aim.
People who don't want to worry about theirfictional lines being critique
don't belong here.
This list isn't to give people help.
Of course it is.
I'm sure the DAR is very proud to have someone soblue-blooded and so
equally clueless in their ranks.people here ask for
IF we can all remember your inane comment about why
sources.
Not everyone is a trained historian or genealogist. Some
are newbies and
don't know the ropes. That's why this list IS to
give people help.
If you don't want to help, go away.
Will Johnson
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Rudeness
- From: Renia
- Re: Rudeness
- References:
- Re: Rudeness
- From: Renia
- Re: Rudeness
- Prev by Date: RE: Rudeness
- Next by Date: Re: Fwd: Rudeness
- Previous by thread: Re: Rudeness
- Next by thread: Re: Rudeness
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|