Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
- From: "Peter Stewart" <p_m_stewart@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 05 Apr 2008 07:05:40 GMT
"M.Sjostrom" <qsj5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mailman.118.1207371325.16726.gen-medieval@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Peter Srewart: "...does not meet the criterion of
RATIONAL discourse..."
A clear point is that Peter Stewart's assessment of
what is rational and what is not, cannot be worth
anything; because evidently Peter Stewart suffers from
problematic mental instability, which makes him devoid
of capability to assess rationality, starting from
irrationality of his own reactions and behavior.
Rational means founded on reason, capable of being tested by reason. I hav
been asking a perfectly reasonable set of questions for days now, with no
reasonable anwer forhtcoming but rather a series of strawmen about denying
the existence of somone, and incredibly obtuse falsehoods about my position
more generally.
For the umpteenth time, what was your REASON for stating: "Volodar Glebovich
of Belarusia, ruler of Minsk and Polatsk, had sons, of whom two is attested
in Russian primary, near-contemporary evidence to have survived over
mid-1190s."?
What is your REASON for refusing to admit that this is untrue, that there is
no "Russian primary, near-contemporary evidence" attesting to two sons of
Volodar Glebovich living at any time, and that consequently you did not know
of any such proof for this relationship of father to sons when you posted
the misleading assertion?
Your attempts to patronise me and newsgroup members with whom I have been
communicating for years by musing inanely about my sanity will not dig you
out of this hole.
Peter Stewart
.
- References:
- Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
- From: M.Sjostrom
- Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
- Prev by Date: Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
- Next by Date: Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
- Previous by thread: Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
- Next by thread: Re: Ingeborg of Denmark
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading