soc.genealogy.medieval

• Date Index

---

• Re: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ..., Jwc1870
• RE: Nobility of Québec Tables, fcoache
  • Re: Nobility of Québec Tables, John P. DuLong
    • Re: Nobility of Québec Tables, Denis Beauregard
• Re: The Fleming-Waterton connection (long), Jwc1870
• A BRIEF Myth and Realty of Michael Flanderais/Le Fleming/de Furness, butlergrt
  • Re: A BRIEF Myth and Realty of Michael Flanderais/Le Fleming/de Furness, FDP527
• William le flemming,Alyna de Furness, William Pincerna(Le Boteler), butlergrt
• Napier Headaches was Fw: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Napier Headaches was Fw: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?, Ian Wallace
• Man Mishandled was -: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, Leo van de Pas
• The Fleming-Waterton connection, Jwc1870
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Fleming-Waterton connection, Jwc1870
• Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, mjcar
  • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, AdrianBnjmBurke
    • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, lostcooper
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, AdrianBnjmBurke
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, AdrianBnjmBurke
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, mjcar
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, AdrianBnjmBurke
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, lostcooper
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, AdrianBnjmBurke
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, mjcar
      • Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Pedigree Of The Early Kings Of Man, WJhonson
• Fw: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Suttonthe younger, Leo van de Pas
• Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB, mjcar
  • Re: Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB, mjcar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB, Tony Hoskins
    • Re: Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB, mjcar
• Botelers of Warrington: The First Generations, butlergrt
• Beatrix of Silesia-Glogau: who were her parents?, Tony Hoskins
• The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?, Kelsey . Jackson . Williams
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?, Leo van de Pas
• Papal dispensations, Diana Trenchard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Papal dispensations, conaught2
• Dafydd ap Llywelyn not born until after 1211?, Mississippienne
  • Re: Dafydd ap Llywelyn not born until after 1211?, wjhonson
    • Re: Dafydd ap Llywelyn not born until after 1211?, Mississippienne
• Cave, Feilding, St Liz etc, wjhonson
  • Re: Cave, Feilding, St Liz etc, wjhonson
• The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, R C
  • Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, mhollick@xxxxxxx
    • RE: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, R C
      • Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, John Brandon
      • RE: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, R C
    • Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, John P. Ravilious
      • Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, Renia
      • Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, John P. Ravilious
      • RE: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of Cornwall (recte)? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?, R C
• Tantalising Hyde remark, Leo van de Pas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: Tantalising Hyde remark, R C
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, pj.evans
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, E . S . Caypatch
    • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Peter Stewart
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Barbarossa
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, D. Spencer Hines
    • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Peter Stewart
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, D. Spencer Hines
  • Fw: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Leo van de Pas
  • Fw: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Peter Stewart
    • I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ..., Barbarossa
      • RE: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ..., David Teague
      • Re: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ..., D. Spencer Hines
      • RE: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ..., David Teague
      • Re: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ..., JohnR
      • RE: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ..., David Teague
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Peter Stewart
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition, Peter Stewart
• Rieux Family Part II, jimpup
• Wife of Donald Ban by Phil Moody, loren_varga
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Wife of Donald Ban by Phil Moody, Jwc1870
• RE:New Italian genealogy...English language, sirnortek
• Re: Britannica, Ken Ozanne
  • Re: Britannica, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Britannica, fchal
  • Re: Britannica, E . S . Caypatch
    • Re: Britannica, Francisco Tavares de Almeida
    • Re: Britannica, Renia
      • Re: Britannica, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Britannica, Renia
      • Re: Britannica, Dave
      • Re: Britannica, Renia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Britannica, Leo van de Pas
  • Fw: Britannica, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Britannica, James Hogg
  • Fw: Fw: Britannica, Leo van de Pas
• re: de Bohun, Le Bon, Bone, Bowman, John Foster
  • Re: de Bohun, Le Bon, Bone, Bowman, taf
    • Re: de Bohun, Le Bon, Bone, Bowman, John Foster
• More E3 Descents for the King Barts of Boyle Abbey, wjhonson
  • Re: More E3 Descents for the King Barts of Boyle Abbey, wjhonson
• OT: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Nathaniel Taylor
  • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, D. Spencer Hines
    • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition, Renia
• New Italian genealogy site,Family tree, history heraldry, sirnortek
• Ancestry Research found in Modern Education Tools, vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Boteler of Warrington: The First Generations, butlergrt
  • Re: Boteler of Warrington: The First Generations, suthen
• MacGregors MacDonald, Wanda Thacker
• Fw: Arthur, Leo van de Pas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Arthur, WJhonson
  • RE: Arthur, David Teague
    • Re: Arthur, wjhonson
• Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger, jhigginsgen
  • Message not available
    • Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger, jhigginsgen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger, Brad Verity
    • Thrilla in Vanilla was Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Thrilla in Vanilla was Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger, Renia
    • Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger, jhigginsgen
      • Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger, Brad Verity
• A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes, John Brandon
  • Re: A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes, wjhonson
    • Re: A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes, John Brandon
      • Re: A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes, John Brandon
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, Jwc1870
  • Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, wjhonson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, Jwc1870
    • Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, wjhonson
  • Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, Jwc1870
  • Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, Jwc1870
• Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford, mjcar
  • Re: Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford, wjhonson
    • Re: Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford, mjcar
      • Re: Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford, mjcar
• More descents from John Dryden, wjhonson
  • Re: More descents from John Dryden, wjhonson
• William I The Conqueror King of England, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: William I The Conqueror King of England, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: William I The Conqueror King of England, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, Jwc1870
  • Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, wjhonson
  • Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives, wjhonson
• Re: Sir Geoffrey de Marsh, Justiciar of Ireland (died 1245), Merilyn Pedrick
• Season's greeteing everyone.., Ian Goddard
• Addendum to the Previous Post, butlergrt
  • Re: Addendum to the Previous Post, Douglas Richardson
• Re: Consent, Ian Wallace
• What To Do? Botelers: Finally the documentation:Warrington Rawcliffe Kirkb, Kirkham Skelbrooke Bedford Butlers of Ireland are the same Family, butlergrt
  • Re: What To Do? Botelers: Finally the documentation:Warrington Rawcliffe Kirkb, Kirkham Skelbrooke Bedford Butlers of Ireland are the same Family, wjhonson
    • Re: What To Do? Botelers: Finally the documentation:Warrington Rawcliffe Kirkb, Kirkham Skelbrooke Bedford Butlers of Ireland are the same Family, CE Wood
• spam attack, lostcooper
  • Re: spam attack, Ian Goddard
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Jwc1870
  • Re: William I The Conqueror King of England, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$, khaled
• Re: Proxy downloads working, Ken Ozanne
  • Re: Proxy downloads working, Ian Goddard
• peter of alifa, jlucsoler
• Christmas and the Three Wise Men, family-living
• RE: Fixing Google Books [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED], Guy Vincent
• Fw: C.P. Correction/Addition: Children of Sir John Neville (died 1420) and his wife, Elizabeth Holand, Leo van de Pas
• www.google.co.nz, rainbow.
  • Re: www.google.co.nz, Ian Goddard
• Kost, Kinsky, and Killigrew, Tony Hoskins
• RE: Fixing Google Books: Proxify vs Regular Google Book Search, a comparison of results for the same 10 initial works found: Or the Value of Proxification, R C
• Fixing Google Books, wjhonson
  • Re: Fixing Google Books, Ian Goddard
    • RE: Fixing Google Books, R C
      • Re: Fixing Google Books, Ian Goddard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Fixing Google Books, Ken Ozanne
    • Re: Fixing Google Books, John Brandon
• CB Correction: Birthdate of John Brownlow of Humby 3rd Bart, wjhonson
• Re: Joyeux Noel et Bonne Année !, Jwc1870
• Fw: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Leo van de Pas
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Leo van de Pas
  • Fw: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Leo van de Pas
• Joyeux Noel et Bonne Année !, John P. Ravilious
• RE: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent fromthe Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc., R C
• Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc., R C
  • Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc., wjhonson
    • RE: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc., R C
  • Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc., wjhonson
    • Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc., wjhonson
    • Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc., wjhonson
• Country Houses and Estates, Geordie
• More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham, wjhonson
  • Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham, wjhonson
    • Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham, wjhonson
      • Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham, wjhonson
      • Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham, wjhonson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham, Leo van de Pas
• ***s of Louix XV, Denis Beauregard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • ***s of Louix XV, Denis Beauregard
    • Re: ***s of Louix XV, Hickory
  • Fw: ***s of Louix XV, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: ***s of Louix XV, Denis Beauregard
• AT of early Japanese monarchs, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs, Hickory
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs, M.Sjostrom
  • Fwd: AT of early Japanese monarchs, Jwc1870
  • Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs, Jwc1870
  • Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs, M.Sjostrom
  • AT of early Japanese monarchs, M.Sjostrom
• Re: Royal Blinding DNA and hemophilia, Wanda Thacker
• Re: DNA and what is royalty?, Wanda Thacker
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Dora Smith
  • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
    • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, CE Wood
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Dora Smith
      • Cunedda, Hovite
      • RE: Cunedda, R C
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
    • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Dora Smith
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, CE Wood
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, wjhonson
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, CE Wood
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, wjhonson
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Dora Smith
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Hovite
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • William I The Conqueror King of England, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Ilya Sonobavich Yugotanastikov
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Dora Smith
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, taf
      • William I The Conqueror King of England, was Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Willelm, Hovite
      • Re: Agnate G�tinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, CHRIS8REGIS
      • Re: Agnate G�tinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, wjhonson
      • Arthur, Hovite
      • Re: Arthur, wjhonson
      • Re: Arthur, CHRIS8REGIS
      • Re: Arthur, wjhonson
      • Re: Arthur, Hovite
      • RE: Arthur, David Teague
      • Message not available
      • Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, mjcar
    • Fictional Welsh Genealogies, Hovite
• David Rohl videos - now on-line, cmccraw
• Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA, Tony Hoskins
• Fw: [Spam?]Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Fw: [Spam?]Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
• A medieval extension for Charles Jenkinson, 1st Earl of Liverpool, wjhonson
  • Re: A medieval extension for Charles Jenkinson, 1st Earl of Liverpool, wjhonson
• That Thomas Harris "aged 38" in the Prosperous is not the son of Sir William Harris of Crixes, wjhonson
• Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece, Renia
    • Re: Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece, John P. Ravilious
      • Re: Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece, taf
• Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
  • Re: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Hickory
    • Re: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
      • Re: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
    • Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
      • Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
  • Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, WJhonson
    • Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse, Margaret
• Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II, Hickory
  • Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II, wjhonson
      • Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II, jhigginsgen
      • Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II, wjhonson
• Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, wjhonson
  • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Monica Kanellis
    • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, wjhonson
    • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, suthen
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Monica Kanellis
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Leo van de Pas
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, wjhonson
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Monica Kanellis
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, wjhonson
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Monica Kanellis
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Renia
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Monica Kanellis
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, Leo van de Pas
      • Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace, wjhonson
• Massachusetts Real Estate, xingni1818
• Re: Byron - missing generation, Ken Ozanne
• Re: Byron, Ken Ozanne
• Re: What is Royalty ?, Jwc1870
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is Royalty ?, Jwc1870
• The problem with Elizabeth Killigrew, wjhonson
  • Re: The problem with Elizabeth Killigrew, mjcar
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The problem with Elizabeth Killigrew, Jwc1870
• New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard, wjhonson
  • Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard, jonmeltzer@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard, John Brandon
      • Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard, John Brandon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard, Leo van de Pas
• Details of Sir Andrew Riccard, wjhonson
• What is Royalty ??, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: What is Royalty ??, disalitervisum28
    • Re: What is Royalty ??, wjhonson
      • Re: What is Royalty ??, Hovite
      • Re: What is Royalty ??, Wanda Thacker
    • Re: What is Royalty ?? almanac de gotha, Wanda Thacker
  • Re: What is Royalty ??, JFB
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: What is Royalty ??, Dora Smith
  • Fw: What is Royalty ??, Leo van de Pas
  • Fw: What is Royalty ??, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: What is Royalty ??, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: What is Royalty ??, M.Sjostrom
    • Re: What is Royalty ??, lostcooper
      • Re: What is Royalty ??, A. Sharp
• Royal Family has extended, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Royal Family has extended, Renia
• Source for the exact date of death for Edward the Exile, DaHoorn
  • Re: Source for the exact date of death for Edward the Exile, Peter Stewart
• Source for exact date of death for Edward the Exile, DaHoorn
• Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, wjhonson
  • Re: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, John Brandon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, wjhonson
  • Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, wjhonson
      • Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, jhigginsgen
      • Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, wjhonson
      • Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley, jhigginsgen
• Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester, John Brandon
  • Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester, John Brandon
    • Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester, John Brandon
      • Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester, John Brandon
      • Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester, John Brandon
      • Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester, John Brandon
      • Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester, John Brandon
• Hi to ALL. I just join this group., ledakenni@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., John H
  • Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group., Ian Goddard
• "once removed" in French, Leticia Cluff
  • Re: "once removed" in French, Peter Stewart
    • Re: "once removed" in French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: "once removed" in French, Renia
    • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Wanda Thacker
    • Re: "once removed" in French, Peter Stewart
      • Re: "once removed" in French, Renia
      • Re: "once removed" in French, Peter Stewart
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, magnusrufus
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Renia
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, magnusrufus
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Renia
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, magnusrufus
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Denis Beauregard
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Peter Stewart
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Renia
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Peter Stewart
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Renia
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Renia
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: "once removed" in French, Denis Beauregard
    • Re: "once removed" in French, Renia
    • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
    • Re: "once removed" in French, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: "once removed" in French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: "once removed" in French, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: "once removed" in French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "once removed" in French, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: "once removed" in French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "once removed" in French, John Brandon
      • Re: "once removed" in French, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: "once removed" in French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Renia
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, Renia
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "Once Removed" In French, John Brandon
      • Re: "once removed" in French, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: "once removed" in French, John Brandon
      • Re: "once removed" in French, letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent, Hickory
  • Re: Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent, suthen
    • Re: Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent, Hickory
      • Re: Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent, wjhonson
• Sheffield of Yorkshire, mjcar
  • Re: Sheffield of Yorkshire, wjhonson
• Unsubscribe, Frank
• Numbers and Charlemagne, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Numbers and Charlemagne, Denis Beauregard
  • Re: Numbers and Charlemagne, roblaw40
    • Re: Numbers and Charlemagne, Monica Kanellis
    • Message not available
      • Re: Numbers and Charlemagne, Leo van de Pas
      • Re: Numbers and Charlemagne, taf
    • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Numbers and Charlemagne, Monica Kanellis
• Royal Blinding, Wanda Thacker
  • Re: Royal Blinding, taf
  • Re: Royal Blinding, Peter Stewart
    • Re: Royal Blinding, Wanda Thacker
  • Re: Royal Blinding, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Royal Blinding, Peter Stewart
    • Re: Royal Blinding, Wanda Thacker
  • Re: Royal Blinding, Hickory
    • Re: Royal Blinding, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Royal Blinding, CE Wood
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Hickory
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Hovite
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Wanda Thacker
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Hickory
    • Re: Royal Blinding, Wanda Thacker
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Royal Blinding, WJhonson
    • Re: Royal Blinding, Hovite
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Hickory
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Hovite
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Viridmontane
      • Re: Royal Blinding, Viridmontane
      • Re: Royal Blinding DNA and hemophilia, Wanda Thacker
  • Re: Royal Blinding, Jwc1870
  • Re: Royal Blinding, Wanda Thacker
• DNA, Wanda Thacker
  • Re: DNA, John Brandon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: DNA, Dora Smith
    • Re: DNA, Ian Goddard
      • Re: DNA, taf
      • Re: DNA, Ian Goddard
      • Re: DNA, Dora Smith
      • Re: DNA, Dora Smith
  • Re: DNA, Dora Smith
  • Re: DNA, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: DNA, Dora Smith
  • Re: DNA, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: DNA, Hickory
      • Re: DNA, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: DNA, gro
      • Re: DNA, Ian Goddard
      • Re: DNA, taf
      • Re: DNA, Wanda Thacker
  • Fw: DNA, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: DNA, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: DNA, Dora Smith
  • Re: DNA, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: DNA, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: DNA, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: DNA, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: DNA, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: DNA, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: DNA, Wanda Thacker
    • Re: DNA, Doug McDonald
  • Re: DNA, Wanda Thacker
  • Re: DNA, Dora Smith
• POLSUE, Ken Ozanne
  • Re: POLSUE, John Brandon
• Fw: Complete Peerage Addition: Antigone of Gloucester, wife of Henry Gray, 2nd Count of Tancarville, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Fw: Complete Peerage Addition: Antigone of Gloucester, wife of Henry Gray, 2nd Count of Tancarville, Douglas Richardson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Fw: Complete Peerage Addition: Antigone of Gloucester, wife of Henry Gray, 2nd Count of Tancarville, Leo van de Pas
• French version of the pedigree of the Plantagenet Family, Douglas Richardson
• Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574, YvonnePurdy
  • Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574, wjhonson
    • Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574, Louise Staley
    • Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574, Louise Staley
      • Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574, wjhonson
      • Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574, Louise Staley
      • RE: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574, YvonnePurdy
• Killigrew and Kinsky, Tony Hoskins
  • Re: Killigrew And Kinsky, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Killigrew and Kinsky, wjhonson
• The personal attacks in this group, pj.evans
  • Re: The personal attacks in this group, John R.
    • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Leo van de Pas
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Renia
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Renia
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Renia
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Personal Attacks In This Group, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Margaret
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The personal attacks in this group, david11000carca
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: The personal attacks in this group, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, D. Spencer Hines
  • Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, pj.evans
      • Re: Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, Wanda Thacker
    • Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, mjcar
      • Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, Margaret
  • Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group, Leo van de Pas
• Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, D. Spencer Hines
• Mr. Richardson Gooffs again, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, D. Spencer Hines
    • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, suthen
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Peter Stewart
      • Message not available
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again, Leticia Cluff
    • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, Renia
    • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again, david11000carca
  • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again, Douglas Richardson
    • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again, david11000carca
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again, Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again, Renia
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again, Renia
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again, Renia
• Transactions - East Riding Antiquarian Society [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED], Guy Vincent
  • Re: Transactions - East Riding Antiquarian Society [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED], Ian Goddard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Transactions - East Riding Antiquarian Society [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED], Guy Vincent
• Allerton, Mary Jane Battaglia
  • Re: Allerton, mhollick@xxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Allerton, Mary Jane Battaglia
    • Re: Allerton, mhollick@xxxxxxx
    • Re: Allerton, mhollick@xxxxxxx
• A royal ascent for John Trelawny, 1st Bart, wjhonson
  • Re: A royal ascent for John Trelawny, 1st Bart, wjhonson
  • Re: A royal ascent for John Trelawny, 1st Bart, jhigginsgen
• Hansard, Snawsell, ?Blount?, Eliza Shannon
• Re: searching for Happiness, Spacy Bickerson
• Fw: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Fw: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Jwc1870
• Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia, vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• coverup, CHRIS8REGIS
  • Re: coverup, taf
• Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book, CHRIS8REGIS
  • Re: Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book, Renia
    • Re: Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book, taf
      • Re: Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book, Renia
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Don Stone
  • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, taf
  • Message not available
    • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, taf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, taf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Don Stone
      • Message not available
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, taf
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, taf
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Renia
      • Message not available
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Don Stone
      • Message not available
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, taf
      • Message not available
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Don Stone
  • Message not available
    • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Don Stone
      • Message not available
      • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, taf
  • Message not available
    • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Don Stone
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, mjcar
  • Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Don Stone
  • Fw: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt, Leo van de Pas
• Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table, pj.evans
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table, Jwc1870
    • Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table, AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table, Renia
  • Fw: Parmenter Ancestor Table, Leo van de Pas
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., CHRIS8REGIS
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., Leticia Cluff
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., taf
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., CHRIS8REGIS
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., John Brandon
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., taf
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., WJhonson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Leo van de Pas
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., wjhonson
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Wanda Thacker
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., wjhonson
  • Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Wanda Thacker
    • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Hickory
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.), Wanda Thacker
      • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Wanda Thacker
  • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., WJhonson
    • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., lostcooper
      • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Hickory
      • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., norenxaq
      • Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ..., norenxaq
• New Sewall book, JohnR
  • Re: New Sewall book, D. Spencer Hines
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: New Sewall book, JohnR
    • Re: New Sewall Book, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: New Sewall Book, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: New Sewall Book, D. Spencer Hines
• When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, Douglas Richardson
  • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, John P. Ravilious
    • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, taf
      • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, John P. Ravilious
      • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, taf
      • Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), wjhonson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), wjhonson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), taf
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Peter Stewart
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), taf
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), taf
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman), Renia
      • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, Renia
      • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, Hovite
    • Message not available
      • Botetourt record in Byerly and Byerly [was Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman], Don Stone
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, Jwc1870
  • Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman, WJhonson
• Entertaining new book with some genealogical content - The Ideal Christmas Present, Ilya Sonobavich Yugotanastikov
  • Re: Entertaining new book with some genealogical content - The Ideal Christmas Present, CHRIS8REGIS
  • Re: Entertaining new book with some genealogical content - The Ideal Christmas Present, roblaw40
• Townshend - Shame and Scandal in the Family, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Townshend - Shame and Scandal in the Family, wjhonson
• Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), wjhonson
  • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), mjcar
  • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), mjcar
    • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), wjhonson
      • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), pavel.pokorny@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), wjhonson
      • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), pavel.pokorny@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), wjhonson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), Tony Hoskins
  • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), M.Sjostrom
  • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), M.Sjostrom
  • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), M.Sjostrom
    • Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), wjhonson
  • Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), Leo van de Pas
    • Re: Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky), wjhonson
• Aurelian Townshend, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Aurelian Townshend, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Aurelian Townshend, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Aurelian Townshend, Robert O'Connor
    • Re: Aurelian Townshend, wjhonson
  • Re: Aurelian Townshend, John Townsend
• Who is the wife of Antoine de Belvezeix ?, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: Who is the wife of Antoine de Belvezeix ?, José Verheecke
• The Woodvile/Dormer connection, the Pakingtons, the Baldwins, and the Newnham co-heiresses, Hickory
  • Re: The Woodvile/Dormer connection, the Pakingtons, the Baldwins, and the Newnham co-heiresses, suthen
    • Re: The Woodvile/Dormer connection, the Pakingtons, the Baldwins, and the Newnham co-heiresses, Hickory
• New ? line of royal descendants?, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: New ? line of royal descendants?, the_verminator@xxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: New ? line of royal descendants?, wjhonson
    • Re: New ? line of royal descendants?, wjhonson
    • Re: New ? line of royal descendants?, wjhonson
      • Re: New ? line of royal descendants?, wjhonson
• Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery, John P. Ravilious
  • Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery, Doug McDonald
    • Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery, John P. Ravilious
      • Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery, wjhonson
      • Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery, John P. Ravilious
• Medieval location in Kent, Alwynne Mackie
  • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Renia
    • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Alwynne Mackie
  • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Ian Goddard
    • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Alwynne Mackie
      • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Ian Goddard
      • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Alwynne Mackie
      • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Ian Goddard
      • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Alwynne Mackie
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Medieval location in Kent, ADRIANCHANNING02
    • Re: Medieval location in Kent, Alwynne Mackie
• Re: Durham Visitation of 1615, Ken Ozanne
  • Re: Durham Visitation of 1615, John Watson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Durham Visitation of 1615, Ken Ozanne
• Sir Rawleigh Bussey died 10 Oct 1623, wjhonson
  • Re: Sir Rawleigh Bussey died 10 Oct 1623, david11000carca
    • Re: Sir Rawleigh Bussey died 10 Oct 1623, wjhonson
• Visitation of Durham 1615, John Watson
  • Re: Visitation of Durham 1615, Ian Goddard
• Royal Connections of the Marquis de Lafayette, Ford Mommaerts-Browne
• Re: Complete Peerage Addition: Marriage date of Edmund de Mortimer and Margaret de Fiennes, Merilyn Pedrick
  • Re: Complete Peerage Addition: Marriage date of Edmund de Mortimer and Margaret de Fiennes, wjhonson
  • Re: Complete Peerage Addition: Marriage date of Edmund de Mortimer and Margaret de Fiennes, wjhonson
• John Driby / Amy Gaveston, wjhonson
  • Re: John Driby / Amy Gaveston, John Watson
    • Re: John Driby / Amy Gaveston, wjhonson
      • Re: John Driby / Amy Gaveston, John Watson
• de Vere and Isham, pschwarz3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Rieux family, jimpup
• Agnes Woodville (Wydville), alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Agnes Woodville (Wydville), david11000carca
• Bello Prato, Trevanion, Trewartheneck and Treaigo of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Baudemont or de Bosco, wjhonson
• biography draft of Niilo, castellan of Kastelholma and Raasepori (d 1520), M.Sjostrom
• Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., WJhonson
  • Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., Peter Stewart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., WJhonson
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., CHRIS8REGIS
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., Leticia Cluff
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., taf
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., CHRIS8REGIS
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., Leticia Cluff
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., Leticia Cluff
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., taf
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., John Brandon
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., CHRIS8REGIS
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., david11000carca
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., mjcar
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., CE Wood
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., taf
  • Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., WJhonson
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL..., John Brandon
• de Vere Ancestry, pschwarz3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Re: de Vere Ancestry, wjhonson
    • Re: de Vere Ancestry, wjhonson
      • Re: de Vere Ancestry, wjhonson
      • Re: de Vere Ancestry, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: de Vere Ancestry, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: de Vere Ancestry, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Alain d'ORLEANS, jlucsoler
• de La Fayette and John DuLong, Leo van de Pas
  • Re: de La Fayette and John DuLong, Olivier
• Re: GEN-MEDIEVAL Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1855, Ken Ozanne
• Re: Royal Connection for the Marquis de La Fayette, Peter Stewart
• WIKIPEDIA is now politically correct to use as a reference resource, vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• #Geoffrey / Galfridus le Despenser Lord Marcheley, rainbow.
  • Re: #Geoffrey / Galfridus le Despenser Lord Marcheley, John P. Ravilious
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), WJhonson
  • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), James Dow Allen
    • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), James Dow Allen
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), WJhonson
  • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), WJhonson
  • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), WJhonson
  • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Ken Ozanne
  • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), WJhonson
  • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), WJhonson
• SEARCHING FOR A GENEALOGICAL SOCIETIES IN THE MIDDLE ORIENT OR MEDITERRANEAN AFRICA, M. de la Fayette
• Origins of the Despensers, Clive West
  • Re: Origins of the Despensers, John P. Ravilious
• Frances (? Lone), first wife of John Dane of Roxbury, John Brandon
  • Re: Frances (? Lone), first wife of John Dane of Roxbury, John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL., Jwc1870
• Nottingham of Ridley Scott, JohnB
  • Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott, John Townsend
    • Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott, JohnB
      • Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott, John Townsend
      • Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott, JohnB
      • Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott, John Townsend
      • Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott, JohnB
• Blanche Parry - William Cecil of Allt-yr-ynys connection, tom
• National Archives wiki., Paul Mackenzie
  • Re: National Archives wiki., taf
    • Re: National Archives wiki., Paul Mackenzie
      • Re: National Archives wiki., Paul Mackenzie
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS, Don Stone
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), taf
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), jhigginsgen
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), wjhonson
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), taf
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), Don Stone
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), D. Spencer Hines
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), WJhonson
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), WJhonson
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S), taf
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, D. Spencer Hines
• Richard Fordham, Le Bateman
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Richard Fordham, Le Bateman
• excutite pulverem de pedibus vestris in testimonium illis, Bill Arnold
  • Re: excutite pulverem de pedibus vestris in testimonium illis, wjhonson
• Re: Alfonso VI of Castile, Francisco Tavares de Almeida
• Re: How many John Middletons ?, Jwc1870
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Jwc1870
  • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Jwc1870
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis hop of Coventry & L:ichfield, AJones9446
• How many John Middletons ?, Jwc1870
  • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Renia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Jwc1870
    • Re: How many John Middletons ?, wjhonson
      • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Renia
      • Re: How many John Middletons ?, wjhonson
      • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Peter Stewart
      • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Renia
      • Re: How many John Middletons ?, Peter Stewart
• YOOLL lands, John H
  • Re: YOOLL lands, Ian Wallace
  • Re: YOOLL lands, Leticia Cluff
  • Re: YOOLL lands, Renia
  • Re: YOOLL lands, John H
• AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., pj.evans
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., pj.evans
      • Looking for genealogical Societies in the Middle Orient or Mediterranean Africa, M. de la Fayette
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER (simplified), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., david11000carca
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER ..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., pj.evans
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER..., Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Don Stone
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
    • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
  • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
  • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
    • AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
  • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
    • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
    • AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
  • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
    • AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfi..., Bill Arnold
  • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfi..., wjhonson
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., WJhonson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfi..., WJhonson
• Re: Mitt Romney's interesting ancestry, wjhonson
• Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, mjcar
  • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, wjhonson
    • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, mjcar
      • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, wjhonson
      • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, mjcar
      • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, wjhonson
  • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, suthen
    • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, mjcar
    • Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes, John P. Ravilious
• The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
  • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
    • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
      • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
      • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
      • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
      • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
      • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
      • Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine, John Brandon
• Anabaptist Rev. Mr. Miles, gone for New England, John Brandon
• Magna Carta Ancestry: addition: Calverley/Drax, mjcar
• Recent trash, mjcar
  • Re: Recent trash, Dantemortem
• the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon), John P. Ravilious
  • Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon), taf
    • Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon), Peter Stewart
      • Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon), taf
      • Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon), Doug McDonald
      • Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon), taf
      • Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon), Peter Stewart
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
  • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
  • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
    • COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
    • [CORRECTION]COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., WJhonson
• de LUCY / MARMION / CAUNTELO, rainbow.
  • Re: de LUCY / MARMION / CAUNTELO, wjhonson
    • Re: de LUCY / MARMION / CAUNTELO, JohnR
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, WJhonson
  • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
• The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, Hickory
  • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, mjcar
    • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, Hickory
      • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, Hickory
      • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, WJhonson
  • Fwd: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, WJhonson
  • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, WJhonson
    • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, Hickory
      • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, wjhonson
      • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, wjhonson
      • Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445, wjhonson
• Grateful acknowledgements, Douglas Richardson
  • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Bill Arnold
    • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Bill Arnold
      • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Grateful Acknowledgements, D. Spencer Hines
      • Message not available
      • Message not available
      • Re: Grateful acknowledgements [REVISED POST], Peter Stewart
      • Re: Grateful Acknowledgements, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Grateful Acknowledgements, Leticia Cluff
      • Re: Grateful Acknowledgements, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Grateful Acknowledgements, Renia
      • Re: Grateful Acknowledgements, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Peter Stewart
    • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, harv2 . lawref
      • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, Peter Stewart
  • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, wjhonson
    • Re: Grateful acknowledgements, wjhonson
• Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I, wjhonson
  • Re: Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I, wjhonson
    • Re: Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I, wjhonson
      • Re: Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I, wjhonson
• The Spencer Family by Charles Spencer, published 1999 by the Penguin Group, Michael form NZ
  • Re: The Spencer Family by Charles Spencer, published 1999 by the Penguin Group, mjcar
• Sir Robert le Vavasour of Shipley, John Watson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Bill Arnold
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Jwc1870
  • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
  • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
    • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Bill Arnold
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • SPADES AND BLADES: WAS Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Bill Arnold
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Bill Arnold
      • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, wjhonson
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Bill Arnold
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
      • COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., taf
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, John Brandon
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, John Brandon
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, John Brandon
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, Doug McDonald
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., John Brandon
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Renia
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., wjhonson
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Bill Arnold
      • Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, wjhonson
    • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Leticia Cluff
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
    • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, wjhonson
• nFS: New Family Search and Evidence Hierarchy in Combining Names, vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: nFS: New Family Search and Evidence Hierarchy in Combining Names, WJhonson
  • Re: nFS: New Family Search and Evidence Hierarchy in Combining Names, WJhonson
• Re: Correction to "Plantagenet Descent: Edward I to Symmes of Barnsley", John P. Ravilious
  • Re: Correction to "Plantagenet Descent: Edward I to Symmes of Barnsley", John P. Ravilious
• Trevanion of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Trevanion of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Trevanion of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
  • Re: Trevanion of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Trevanion of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Trevanion of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Trevanion of Cornwall, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• "Wainia" --"Waima": an unusual given name?, dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• EARLY AMERICAN HISTORY: WAS Re: Chief Illiniwek, Bill Arnold
  • Re: EARLY AMERICAN HISTORY: WAS Re: Chief Illiniwek, lostcooper
• Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, wjhonson
  • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, Bill Arnold
  • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, wjhonson
    • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, taf
      • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, wjhonson
      • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, John Brandon
      • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, taf
      • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, wjhonson
      • Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil, Renia
• Re: Seal of Ida de Oddingseles (died 1325), wife of Roger de Herdeburgh and John de Clinton, Ian Wallace
  • Message not available
    • Message not available
      • Re: Seal of Ida de Oddingseles (died 1325), wife of Roger de Herdeburgh and John de Clinton, Howard
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., Jwc1870
• Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG), Jwc1870
  • Descents From Multiple Mediaeval Siblings, D. Spencer Hines
• Huntly Gordons, pajunkin
  • Re: Huntly Gordons, wjhonson
  • Re: Huntly Gordons, James Dempster
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Huntly Gordons, pajunkin
  • Re: Huntly Gordons, WJhonson
  • Re: Huntly Gordons, pajunkin
  • Re: Huntly Gordons, pajunkin
• Any royal lines for Philippa (Prest) Leigh, mother of Lucretia (Leigh) Bonython?, John Brandon
  • Re: Any royal lines for Philippa (Prest) Leigh, mother of Lucretia (Leigh) Bonython?, John Brandon
• 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, AdrianBnjmBurke
    • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, AdrianBnjmBurke
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Renia
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Denis Beauregard
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, WJhonson
    • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Doug McDonald
      • Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle, Doug McDonald
  • Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle, WJhonson
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
    • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, taf
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, wjhonson
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, wjhonson
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
      • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Renia
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
  • Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle, Bill Arnold
  • Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle, WJhonson
  • Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle, Merilyn Pedrick
  • Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle, Bill Arnold
• The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, M.Sjostrom
  • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Peter Stewart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, M.Sjostrom
  • The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, M.Sjostrom
    • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, Peter Stewart
• counts of aalst/alost, Louise
  • Re: counts of aalst/alost, John Watson
  • Re: counts of aalst/alost, Renia
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • RE: counts of aalst/alost, Willem Nabuurs
  • counts of Aalst/Alost, Louise
    • Re: counts of Aalst/Alost, John Watson
      • Re: counts of Aalst/Alost, Louise
• Sinclair of Rosslyn, wjhonson
  • Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn, John P. Ravilious
    • Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn, John Watson
      • Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn, taf
      • Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn, John Watson
      • Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn, John Watson
• Renia Test, pschwarz3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Test, Renia
  • Re: Test, pj.evans
  • RE: Test, fcoache
    • Re: Test, Renia
  • Re: Test / I did, PA, Dolores C. Phifer
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield [REVISED POST], taf
• Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk, Rose
  • Re: Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk, Renia
    • Re: Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk, Tim
      • Re: Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk, Renia
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., WJhonson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., Jwc1870
    • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., taf
  • Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., Jwc1870
  • Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., Jwc1870
    • Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., Peter Stewart
      • Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., Peter Stewart
    • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., wjhonson
  • Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h..., Jwc1870
• The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Hickory
  • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, lostcooper
  • Message not available
    • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, mjcar
      • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Peter Stewart
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Kay Allen
  • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Kay Allen
    • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Kay Allen
      • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Renia
  • Fwd: Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire, Kay Allen
• Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, Douglas Richardson
  • Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Message not available
      • Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, taf
      • Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, Doug McDonald
      • Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Ian Wood's Book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, D. Spencer Hines
    • Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, Doug McDonald
      • Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751, D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
  • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
    • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, david11000carca
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Bill Arnold
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Douglas Richardson
    • Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield, D. Spencer Hines
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
    • Message not available
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, Peter Stewart
    • Message not available
      • Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield, taf
• Clovis to Christopher Branch?, gro
  • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, gryphon801@xxxxxxx
      • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, taf
      • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, taf
      • RE: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, Willem Nabuurs
  • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, lostcooper
      • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, wjhonson
  • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, wjhonson
    • Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?, wjhonson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: Will of Henry Peck 1525, Renia
• fw matrilineal descents, lostcooper
  • Re: fw matrilineal descents, Christopher Ingham
    • Matrilineal Descents, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Matrilineal Descents, lostcooper
• RE: crusaders, Bob Turcott
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: crusaders, WJhonson
• Concerning the de Driby post, Hickory
• The de Driby family of Lincolnshire--a simple summary, Hickory
• Mauger de Carteret, PALarge
  • Re: Mauger de Carteret, taf
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Mauger de Carteret, PALarge
• PECK Family from SAMPFORD HALL ESSEX, cathy carley
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', Roger LeBlanc
  • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', John P. Ravilious
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', Peter Stewart
    • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', taf
      • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', Peter Stewart
      • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', taf
      • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', Peter Stewart
    • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', John P. Ravilious
      • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', Peter Stewart
    • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', Roger LeBlanc
  • Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps', Jwc1870
• Next TAG, amgen
  • Re: Next TAG, John Brandon
  • Re: Next TAG, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Next TAG, John Brandon
    • Re: Next TAG, jonmeltzer@xxxxxxxxx
    • Re: Next TAG, alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG), rmm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG), D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Next TAG, AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington..., WJhonson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington..., WJhonson
    • Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington..., butlergrt
  • Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington..., WJhonson
    • Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington..., wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne, WJhonson
  • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, wjhonson
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Bill Arnold
    • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Bill Arnold
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Bill Arnold
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, viridmontane
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Bill Arnold
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, taf
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Nathaniel Taylor
  • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Jwc1870
  • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Bill Arnold
    • Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne), Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne), John Brandon
      • Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne), Bill Arnold
      • Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne), Bill Arnold
      • Re: American gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne), Bill Arnold
    • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, fchal
• Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse, Doug McDonald
  • Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse, pierre_aronax@xxxxxxxxxxx
      • Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse, Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington....Maybe-Maybe NOT!!, wjhonson
  • Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington....Maybe-Maybe NOT!!, butlergrt
    • Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington....Maybe-Maybe NOT!!, Douglas Richardson
• Re: Sir Thomas More's mother, wjhonson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Bill Arnold
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Bill Arnold
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, taf
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, taf
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, wjhonson
  • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Bill Arnold
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, taf
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, taf
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, taf
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, taf
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Renia
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Belton, Yorkshire, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Norfolk, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk, wjhonson
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk, wjhonson
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Belton, Yorkshire, Renia
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Lake and Leake, Renia
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Renia
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Peter Stewart
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, John Brandon
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck, Bill Arnold
  • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, WJhonson
    • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE, taf
• Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic], Nathaniel Taylor
  • Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic], Francisco Tavares de Almeida
    • Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic], Doug McDonald
    • Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic], Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: A Possible descent from Dracula, lostcooper
  • Re: A Possible descent from Dracula, Francisco Tavares de Almeida
    • Re: A Possible descent from Dracula, CHRIS8REGIS
• Anne Scrope in stereo, wjhonson
  • Re: Anne Scrope in stereo, John Watson
    • Re: Anne Scrope in stereo, Derek Howard
• Re: Robert Guiscard Hauteville, wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT, Merilyn Pedrick
  • Re: Gramma's AT, Nathaniel Taylor
    • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
    • Re: Gramma's AT, lmahler
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, lmahler
    • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
    • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, Douglas Richardson
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, lmahler
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, lmahler
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, wjhonson
      • RE: Gramma's AT, Hal Bradley
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, wjhonson
      • Re: Gramma's AT, wjhonson
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, Mary Jane Battaglia
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, Merilyn Pedrick
      • Re: Gramma's AT, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Gramma's AT, Merilyn Pedrick
      • Re: Gramma's AT, lmahler
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, wjhonson
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, wjhonson
      • Re: Gramma's AT, harv2 . lawref
      • Re: Gramma's AT, wjhonson
  • Re: Gramma's AT, WJhonson
    • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
      • Re: Gramma's AT, lmahler
  • Re: Gramma's AT, WJhonson
  • Re: Gramma's AT, WJhonson
    • Re: Gramma's AT, D. Spencer Hines
      • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
  • Re: Gramma's AT, WJhonson
    • Re: Gramma's AT, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Gramma's AT, WJhonson
    • Re: Gramma's AT, D. Spencer Hines
  • Re: Gramma's AT, WJhonson
  • Re: Gramma's AT, pajunkin
    • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
  • Re: Gramma's AT, Jwc1870
  • Re: Gramma's AT, Jwc1870
    • Re: Gramma's AT, John Brandon
• Re: Descents From Charlemange, wjhonson
  • Re: Descents From Charlemange, John Watson
    • Descents From Charlemagne, Bill Arnold
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Nathaniel Taylor
      • Re: Descents From Charlemagne, Bill Arnold
  • Re: Descents From Charlemange, James Dow Allen
    • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Doug McDonald
      • Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), James Dow Allen
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Doug McDonald
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Doug McDonald
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Doug McDonald
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Doug McDonald
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Doug McDonald
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Ian Fettes
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), James Dow Allen
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Ian Fettes
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), wjhonson
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), Peter Stewart
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), wjhonson
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), jhigginsgen
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), jhigginsgen
      • Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne), jhigginsgen
    • Re: Descents From Charlemange, lostcooper
  • <Possible follow-ups>
  • Re: Descents From Charlemange, WJhonson
  • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Marcus Aurelius
    • Re: Descents From Charlemange, wjhonson
  • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Jwc1870
    • Re: Descents From Charlemange, wjhonson
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, wjhonson
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, taf
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, wjhonson
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, taf
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, taf
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, taf
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Peter Stewart
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, taf
      • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Peter Stewart
  • Re: Descents From Charlemange, Jwc1870
    • Re: Descents From Charlemange, wjhonson

• Security
• UNIX
• Linux
• Coding
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

newsgroups.derkeiler.com  > Archive  > Soc  > soc.genealogy.medieval  > 2007-12