soc.genealogy.medieval

• Thread Index

---

• Re: de Bohun, Le Bon, Bone, Bowman
  • From: John Foster
• Re: de Bohun, Le Bon, Bone, Bowman
  • From: taf
• Re: Arthur
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Nobility of Québec Tables
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• Re: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ...
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger
  • From: Brad Verity
• RE: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ...
  • From: David Teague
• Re: Nobility of Québec Tables
  • From: John P. DuLong
• RE: Nobility of Québec Tables
  • From: fcoache
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: The Fleming-Waterton connection (long)
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: A BRIEF Myth and Realty of Michael Flanderais/Le Fleming/de Furness
  • From: FDP527
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Re: Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB
  • From: mjcar
• Re: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ...
  • From: JohnR
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: lostcooper
• RE: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ...
  • From: David Teague
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Papal dispensations
  • From: conaught2
• Re: Napier Headaches was Fw: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?
  • From: Ian Wallace
• Re: DNA
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Pedigree Of The Early Kings Of Man
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• RE: Arthur
  • From: David Teague
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Arthur
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: lostcooper
• RE: Arthur
  • From: David Teague
• RE: I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ...
  • From: David Teague
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• A BRIEF Myth and Realty of Michael Flanderais/Le Fleming/de Furness
  • From: butlergrt
• Re: The Fleming-Waterton connection
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Thrilla in Vanilla was Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger
  • From: Renia
• William le flemming,Alyna de Furness, William Pincerna(Le Boteler)
  • From: butlergrt
• Napier Headaches was Fw: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Man Mishandled was -: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Thrilla in Vanilla was Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• The Fleming-Waterton connection
  • From: Jwc1870
• Pedigree of the early Kings of Man
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB
  • From: mjcar
• Fw: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Fw: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Suttonthe younger
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger
  • From: Brad Verity
• Re: Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB
  • From: Tony Hoskins
• Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?
  • From: Kelsey . Jackson . Williams
• Thomas Stanley, 2nd Earl of Derby: DOB
  • From: mjcar
• Botelers of Warrington: The First Generations
  • From: butlergrt
• Beatrix of Silesia-Glogau: who were her parents?
  • From: Tony Hoskins
• The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York?
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Dafydd ap Llywelyn not born until after 1211?
  • From: Mississippienne
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Renia
• RE: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of Cornwall (recte)? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: R C
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Dave
• Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• I Actually HAVE an Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition ...
  • From: Barbarossa
• Re: A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Barbarossa
• Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: Renia
• Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Papal dispensations
  • From: Diana Trenchard
• Re: Dafydd ap Llywelyn not born until after 1211?
  • From: wjhonson
• Dafydd ap Llywelyn not born until after 1211?
  • From: Mississippienne
• Re: William I The Conqueror King of England
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• RE: Tantalising Hyde remark
  • From: R C
• RE: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: R C
• Re: Cave, Feilding, St Liz etc
  • From: wjhonson
• Cave, Feilding, St Liz etc
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: John Brandon
• RE: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: R C
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: mhollick@xxxxxxx
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Arthur
  • From: Hovite
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th Edition
  • From: Peter Stewart
• The Lords Napier: Ancestors of HRH The Duchess of York? or, Who was Capt. Peter William Napier, R.N. Commissioner of the Port and Harbour of Quebec?
  • From: R C
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Renia
• Tantalising Hyde remark
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Fw: Fw: Britannica
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Fw: Britannica
  • From: James Hogg
• Re: William I The Conqueror King of England
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Fw: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Fw: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Fw: Britannica
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Fw: Britannica
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: E . S . Caypatch
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: pj.evans
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Wife of Donald Ban by Phil Moody
  • From: Jwc1870
• RE: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574
  • From: YvonnePurdy
• Rieux Family Part II
  • From: jimpup
• Wife of Donald Ban by Phil Moody
  • From: loren_varga
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Renia
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Francisco Tavares de Almeida
• Re: Britannica
  • From: fchal
• Re: Britannica
  • From: E . S . Caypatch
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• RE:New Italian genealogy...English language
  • From: sirnortek
• Re: Boteler of Warrington: The First Generations
  • From: suthen
• Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574
  • From: Louise Staley
• Re: Britannica
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574
  • From: Louise Staley
• Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574
  • From: Louise Staley
• re: de Bohun, Le Bon, Bone, Bowman
  • From: John Foster
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Renia
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: More E3 Descents for the King Barts of Boyle Abbey
  • From: wjhonson
• More E3 Descents for the King Barts of Boyle Abbey
  • From: wjhonson
• OT: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 11th edition
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Don Stone
• New Italian genealogy site,Family tree, history heraldry
  • From: sirnortek
• Re: A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Ancestry Research found in Modern Education Tools
  • From: vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: Jwc1870
• Boteler of Warrington: The First Generations
  • From: butlergrt
• Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: Jwc1870
• MacGregors MacDonald
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes
  • From: wjhonson
• Fw: Arthur
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Changing the Sutton/Dudley pedigree: The mother of John de Sutton the younger
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Arthur
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Arthur
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Arthur
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford
  • From: wjhonson
• A few additions and corrections to the _Great Migration_ volumes
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: Jwc1870
• Arthur
  • From: Hovite
• Re: spam attack
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Jane Stanley and Henry Clifford
  • From: mjcar
• Re: More descents from John Dryden
  • From: wjhonson
• More descents from John Dryden
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate G�tinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate G�tinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• William I The Conqueror King of England
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: wjhonson
• Aske Redux : Conan, Conan, Roger , Conan Aske of Aske and their wives
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Sir Geoffrey de Marsh, Justiciar of Ireland (died 1245)
  • From: Merilyn Pedrick
• Re: Addendum to the Previous Post
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: What To Do? Botelers: Finally the documentation:Warrington Rawcliffe Kirkb, Kirkham Skelbrooke Bedford Butlers of Ireland are the same Family
  • From: CE Wood
• Re: What To Do? Botelers: Finally the documentation:Warrington Rawcliffe Kirkb, Kirkham Skelbrooke Bedford Butlers of Ireland are the same Family
  • From: wjhonson
• Season's greeteing everyone..
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Addendum to the Previous Post
  • From: butlergrt
• Fictional Welsh Genealogies
  • From: Hovite
• RE: Cunedda
  • From: R C
• Re: Consent
  • From: Ian Wallace
• What To Do? Botelers: Finally the documentation:Warrington Rawcliffe Kirkb, Kirkham Skelbrooke Bedford Butlers of Ireland are the same Family
  • From: butlergrt
• Cunedda
  • From: Hovite
• Willelm
  • From: Hovite
• spam attack
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: William I The Conqueror King of England
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Jwc1870
• $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
  • From: khaled
• Re: Proxy downloads working
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: www.google.co.nz
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: Fixing Google Books
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: Proxy downloads working
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• peter of alifa
  • From: jlucsoler
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Ilya Sonobavich Yugotanastikov
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Christmas and the Three Wise Men
  • From: family-living
• William I The Conqueror King of England
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• RE: Fixing Google Books [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • From: Guy Vincent
• William I The Conqueror King of England, was Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Fw: C.P. Correction/Addition: Children of Sir John Neville (died 1420) and his wife, Elizabeth Holand
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: mjcar
• www.google.co.nz
  • From: rainbow.
• Kost, Kinsky, and Killigrew
  • From: Tony Hoskins
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Hovite
• Re: Fixing Google Books
  • From: John Brandon
• RE: Fixing Google Books: Proxify vs Regular Google Book Search, a comparison of results for the same 10 initial works found: Or the Value of Proxification
  • From: R C
• Re: Fixing Google Books
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• RE: Fixing Google Books
  • From: R C
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• AT of early Japanese monarchs
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: Fixing Google Books
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Fw: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: wjhonson
• Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs
  • From: Jwc1870
• Fixing Google Books
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: CE Wood
• Fw: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• CB Correction: Birthdate of John Brownlow of Humby 3rd Bart
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Joyeux Noel et Bonne Année !
  • From: Jwc1870
• RE: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc.
  • From: R C
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: wjhonson
• Fwd: AT of early Japanese monarchs
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: pavel.pokorny@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc.
  • From: wjhonson
• Fw: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc.
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc.
  • From: wjhonson
• Fw: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc.
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: CE Wood
• Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Joyeux Noel et Bonne Année !
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• RE: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent fromthe Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc.
  • From: R C
• Re: Giving Constantia Ernle a Royal Ascent: and now her descent from the Royalist Ernle family of Whetham, Calne, Wilts., etc.
  • From: R C
• Re: Fw: ***s of Louix XV
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• Country Houses and Estates
  • From: Geordie
• Re: ***s of Louix XV
  • From: Hickory
• Re: AT of early Japanese monarchs
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Re: More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Fw: [Spam?]Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• More ancestry for the Palmer baronet's of Wingham
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Fw: ***s of Louix XV
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• ***s of Louix XV
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• ***s of Louix XV
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• AT of early Japanese monarchs
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: Royal Blinding DNA and hemophilia
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: DNA and what is royalty?
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: What is Royalty ?? almanac de gotha
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Royal Blinding DNA and hemophilia
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: CE Wood
• Re: Numbers and Charlemagne
  • From: taf
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: DNA
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: DNA
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: DNA
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: Numbers and Charlemagne
  • From: Monica Kanellis
• David Rohl videos - now on-line
  • From: cmccraw
• Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: Numbers and Charlemagne
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Numbers and Charlemagne
  • From: Monica Kanellis
• Re: Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: Tony Hoskins
• Agnate Gâtinais-Anjou-Plantagenet: was Re: DNA
  • From: Tony Hoskins
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Monica Kanellis
• Re: DNA
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Fw: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: DNA
  • From: taf
• Re: DNA
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: DNA
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: Numbers and Charlemagne
  • From: roblaw40
• Re: DNA
  • From: gro
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: pavel.pokorny@xxxxxxxxx
• Fw: [Spam?]Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Re: Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece
  • From: taf
• Re: A medieval extension for Charles Jenkinson, 1st Earl of Liverpool
  • From: wjhonson
• A medieval extension for Charles Jenkinson, 1st Earl of Liverpool
  • From: wjhonson
• That Thomas Harris "aged 38" in the Prosperous is not the son of Sir William Harris of Crixes
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Renia
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Monica Kanellis
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece
  • From: Renia
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Monica Kanellis
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Renia
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Fw: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Fw: Example of Colette in English medieval record/Neptis as niece
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Monica Kanellis
• Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Amauberge la Dangereuse
  • From: Margaret
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: A. Sharp
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: suthen
• Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Killigrew and Kinsky
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: Monica Kanellis
• Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Sheffield of Yorkshire
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The problem with Elizabeth Killigrew
  • From: Jwc1870
• Welsh traditions of male-line descent from Henry II
  • From: Hickory
• Re: DNA
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Sir Rawleigh Bussey died 10 Oct 1623
  • From: wjhonson
• Another Royal Ascent for Ada (Byron) Lovelace
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: JFB
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Sir Rawleigh Bussey died 10 Oct 1623
  • From: david11000carca
• Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard
  • From: jonmeltzer@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: Hovite
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Fw: What is Royalty ??
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: DNA
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Massachusetts Real Estate
  • From: xingni1818
• Re: DNA
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Source for the exact date of death for Edward the Exile
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Byron - missing generation
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: Byron
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: The problem with Elizabeth Killigrew
  • From: mjcar
• Re: DNA
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Allerton
  • From: mhollick@xxxxxxx
• Re: Allerton
  • From: mhollick@xxxxxxx
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: disalitervisum28
• Fw: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: wjhonson
• Allerton
  • From: Mary Jane Battaglia
• Re: New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: What is Royalty ?
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: What is Royalty ?
  • From: Jwc1870
• The problem with Elizabeth Killigrew
  • From: wjhonson
• New ? Royal Gateway ancestor was Fw: Details of Sir Andrew Riccard
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Fw: What is Royalty ??
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: What is Royalty ??
  • From: Dora Smith
• Details of Sir Andrew Riccard
  • From: wjhonson
• What is Royalty ??
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Royal Family has extended
  • From: Renia
• Royal Family has extended
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: wjhonson
• Source for the exact date of death for Edward the Exile
  • From: DaHoorn
• Source for exact date of death for Edward the Exile
  • From: DaHoorn
• Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: John Brandon
• Fw: Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Genealogics : the ascent of Alice Strelley
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Gifford and Bromwich returned for Cirencester
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: DNA
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: John H
• Hi to ALL. I just join this group.
  • From: ledakenni@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: letiTiAflufF@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent
  • From: suthen
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: norenxaq
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: norenxaq
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Hickory
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: magnusrufus
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: magnusrufus
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: magnusrufus
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: "Once Removed" In French
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Renia
• Re: "once removed" in French
  • From: Peter Stewart
• "once removed" in French
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Viridmontane
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Viridmontane
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Hovite
• Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Margaret
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Hickory
• Evidence for a Woodville, Dormer, Baldwin descent
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Hovite
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Hovite
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: mjcar
• Sheffield of Yorkshire
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: mjcar
• Unsubscribe
  • From: Frank
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: CE Wood
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Numbers and Charlemagne
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• Re: DNA
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Fw: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: DNA
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Don Stone
• Numbers and Charlemagne
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Royal Blinding
  • From: taf
• Re: Transactions - East Riding Antiquarian Society [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Royal Blinding
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: DNA
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: taf
• Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: DNA
  • From: Dora Smith
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: taf
• Re: DNA
  • From: John Brandon
• Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• DNA
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: POLSUE
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.)
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• POLSUE
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Don Stone
• Re: Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: pj.evans
• Transactions - East Riding Antiquarian Society [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • From: Guy Vincent
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: david11000carca
• Fw: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Personal Attacks In This Group
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Fw: Fw: Complete Peerage Addition: Antigone of Gloucester, wife of Henry Gray, 2nd Count of Tancarville
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Fw: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Fw: Complete Peerage Addition: Antigone of Gloucester, wife of Henry Gray, 2nd Count of Tancarville
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Fw: Complete Peerage Addition: Antigone of Gloucester, wife of Henry Gray, 2nd Count of Tancarville
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: suthen
• French version of the pedigree of the Plantagenet Family
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Margaret
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: Hovite
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Renia
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Renia
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again
  • From: Renia
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Ralph WORSLEY will proved 28 January 1574
  • From: YvonnePurdy
• Re: Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again
  • From: Renia
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Renia
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again
  • From: Renia
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ... (collaborative databases etc.)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Killigrew And Kinsky
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] Again
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Allerton
  • From: mhollick@xxxxxxx
• Killigrew and Kinsky
  • From: Tony Hoskins
• Re: Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again
  • From: david11000carca
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs again
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The personal attacks in this group
  • From: John R.
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: david11000carca
• The personal attacks in this group
  • From: pj.evans
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Renia
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Renia
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Fw: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Mr. Richardson Gooffs [sic] again
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: taf
• Fw: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Mr. Richardson Gooffs again
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: taf
• Re: New Sewall Book
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: New Sewall Book
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Don Stone
• Fw: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: A royal ascent for John Trelawny, 1st Bart
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: taf
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: taf
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Don Stone
• Transactions - East Riding Antiquarian Society [SEC=UNCLASSIFIED]
  • From: Guy Vincent
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: A royal ascent for John Trelawny, 1st Bart
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Alwynne Mackie
• Allerton
  • From: Mary Jane Battaglia
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• A royal ascent for John Trelawny, 1st Bart
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book
  • From: Renia
• Re: Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book
  • From: taf
• Fw: Parmenter Ancestor Table
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Hansard, Snawsell, ?Blount?
  • From: Eliza Shannon
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Re: searching for Happiness
  • From: Spacy Bickerson
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Fw: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Fw: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Renia
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: Renia
• Re: Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book
  • From: Renia
• Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table
  • From: Renia
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Don Stone
• Fw: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Wanda Thacker
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: taf
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: taf
• Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table
  • From: AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Cooperation and quality in Wikipedia
  • From: vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: coverup
  • From: taf
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: mjcar
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• coverup
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: taf
• Todd Farmerie paid a vanity press to publish his pamphlet which he calls a book
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: New Sewall Book
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Parentage of Sir John Botetourt, 1st Lord Botetourt
  • From: Don Stone
• Botetourt record in Byerly and Byerly [was Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman]
  • From: Don Stone
• Re: Parmenter Ancestor Table
  • From: pj.evans
• Re: New Sewall book
  • From: JohnR
• Re: Aurelian Townshend
  • From: John Townsend
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Colin / Wilkin / Robin etc. (was re: nepos = kinsman)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Entertaining new book with some genealogical content - The Ideal Christmas Present
  • From: roblaw40
• Re: New Sewall book
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• New Sewall book
  • From: JohnR
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: taf
• Re: When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• When nepos/nepoti/nepotis means kinsman
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Entertaining new book with some genealogical content - The Ideal Christmas Present
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Entertaining new book with some genealogical content - The Ideal Christmas Present
  • From: Ilya Sonobavich Yugotanastikov
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: david11000carca
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Woodvile/Dormer connection, the Pakingtons, the Baldwins, and the Newnham co-heiresses
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Alwynne Mackie
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Who is the wife of Antoine de Belvezeix ?
  • From: José Verheecke
• Re: Townshend - Shame and Scandal in the Family
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: Aurelian Townshend
  • From: wjhonson
• Townshend - Shame and Scandal in the Family
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Aurelian Townshend
  • From: Robert O'Connor
• Re: Aurelian Townshend
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: The Woodvile/Dormer connection, the Pakingtons, the Baldwins, and the Newnham co-heiresses
  • From: suthen
• Re: Aurelian Townshend
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Elizabeth Countess Kinski (or Kinsky)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Durham Visitation of 1615
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: wjhonson
• Aurelian Townshend
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Alwynne Mackie
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Alwynne Mackie
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Alwynne Mackie
• Re: New ? line of royal descendants?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: New ? line of royal descendants?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: New ? line of royal descendants?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: New ? line of royal descendants?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: New ? line of royal descendants?
  • From: the_verminator@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Durham Visitation of 1615
  • From: John Watson
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: taf
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Renia
• Who is the wife of Antoine de Belvezeix ?
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• The Woodvile/Dormer connection, the Pakingtons, the Baldwins, and the Newnham co-heiresses
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: wjhonson
• New ? line of royal descendants?
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Agnes 'of the Isles' and Agnes Montgomery
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: taf
• Re: Medieval location in Kent
  • From: ADRIANCHANNING02
• Medieval location in Kent
  • From: Alwynne Mackie
• Re: Visitation of Durham 1615
  • From: Ian Goddard
• Re: Durham Visitation of 1615
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Sir Rawleigh Bussey died 10 Oct 1623
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
• Visitation of Durham 1615
  • From: John Watson
• Re: Complete Peerage Addition: Marriage date of Edmund de Mortimer and Margaret de Fiennes
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: taf
• Re: Complete Peerage Addition: Marriage date of Edmund de Mortimer and Margaret de Fiennes
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Royal Connections of the Marquis de Lafayette
  • From: Ford Mommaerts-Browne
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: CE Wood
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: taf
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: taf
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: AaronParmenter@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Complete Peerage Addition: Marriage date of Edmund de Mortimer and Margaret de Fiennes
  • From: Merilyn Pedrick
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Marcus Aurelius
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: taf
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: John Driby / Amy Gaveston
  • From: John Watson
• Re: John Driby / Amy Gaveston
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: John Driby / Amy Gaveston
  • From: John Watson
• John Driby / Amy Gaveston
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Agnes Woodville (Wydville)
  • From: david11000carca
• Re: de Vere Ancestry
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• de Vere and Isham
  • From: pschwarz3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: de Vere Ancestry
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Rieux family
  • From: jimpup
• Agnes Woodville (Wydville)
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: de Vere Ancestry
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: de La Fayette and John DuLong
  • From: Olivier
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Ian Fettes
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: lmahler
• Bello Prato, Trevanion, Trewartheneck and Treaigo of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Merilyn Pedrick
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: taf
• Baudemont or de Bosco
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Peter Stewart
• biography draft of Niilo, castellan of Kastelholma and Raasepori (d 1520)
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Merilyn Pedrick
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: de Vere Ancestry
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: pajunkin
• Re: de Vere Ancestry
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: de Vere Ancestry
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• de Vere Ancestry
  • From: pschwarz3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Alain d'ORLEANS
  • From: jlucsoler
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Ian Fettes
• Re: Trevanion of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: WJhonson
• de La Fayette and John DuLong
  • From: Leo van de Pas
• Re: GEN-MEDIEVAL Digest, Vol 2, Issue 1855
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: Royal Connection for the Marquis de La Fayette
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• Re: #Geoffrey / Galfridus le Despenser Lord Marcheley
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Origins of the Despensers
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: National Archives wiki.
  • From: Paul Mackenzie
• Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott
  • From: JohnB
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Ken Ozanne
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott
  • From: John Townsend
• Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott
  • From: JohnB
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott
  • From: John Townsend
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: Doug McDonald
• WIKIPEDIA is now politically correct to use as a reference resource
  • From: vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott
  • From: JohnB
• Re: Nottingham of Ridley Scott
  • From: John Townsend
• #Geoffrey / Galfridus le Despenser Lord Marcheley
  • From: rainbow.
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: WJhonson
• Albert's agnatic and uterine ancestry (Paths to Charlemagne)
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Mary Jane Battaglia
• Re: National Archives wiki.
  • From: Paul Mackenzie
• Re: Frances (? Lone), first wife of John Dane of Roxbury
  • From: John Brandon
• SEARCHING FOR A GENEALOGICAL SOCIETIES IN THE MIDDLE ORIENT OR MEDITERRANEAN AFRICA
  • From: M. de la Fayette
• Origins of the Despensers
  • From: Clive West
• Frances (? Lone), first wife of John Dane of Roxbury
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL.
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: WJhonson
• Fwd: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: taf
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: Hickory
• Re: National Archives wiki.
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: Don Stone
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Don Stone
• Nottingham of Ridley Scott
  • From: JohnB
• Blanche Parry - William Cecil of Allt-yr-ynys connection
  • From: tom
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• National Archives wiki.
  • From: Paul Mackenzie
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: taf
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER ...
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: david11000carca
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: jhigginsgen
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS
  • From: Don Stone
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S)
  • From: taf
• Re: excutite pulverem de pedibus vestris in testimonium illis
  • From: wjhonson
• RE: Gramma's AT
  • From: Hal Bradley
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Richard Fordham
  • From: Le Bateman
• Richard Fordham
  • From: Le Bateman
• excutite pulverem de pedibus vestris in testimonium illis
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Renia
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Grateful Acknowledgements
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Renia
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Renia
• Re: Grateful Acknowledgements
  • From: Renia
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon)
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: YOOLL lands
  • From: John H
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Renia
• Re: YOOLL lands
  • From: Renia
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Renia
• Re: Alfonso VI of Castile
  • From: Francisco Tavares de Almeida
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER...
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Looking for genealogical Societies in the Middle Orient or Mediterranean Africa
  • From: M. de la Fayette
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: pj.evans
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER (simplified)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis hop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: AJones9446
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: pj.evans
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: YOOLL lands
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• How many John Middletons ?
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: pj.evans
• Re: YOOLL lands
  • From: Ian Wallace
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Fwd: Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Kay Allen
• AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF THIS MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• YOOLL lands
  • From: John H
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: John Brandon
• AN OPEN LETTER TO THE OWNER OF GEN-MEDIEVAL, ET AL. MESSAGE BOARD(S): Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfi...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Kay Allen
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfi...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Grateful Acknowledgements
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfi...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Kay Allen
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• [CORRECTION]COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• COPYRIGHT LAW AND LIBEL LAWS: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon)
  • From: taf
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Grateful Acknowledgements
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Grateful Acknowledgements
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Peter Stewart Is Not His Real Name?
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon)
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Grateful Acknowledgements
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Seal of Ida de Oddingseles (died 1325), wife of Roger de Herdeburgh and John de Clinton
  • From: Howard
• Re: de LUCY / MARMION / CAUNTELO
  • From: JohnR
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: Hickory
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements [REVISED POST]
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Trevanion of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon)
  • From: taf
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Mitt Romney's interesting ancestry
  • From: wjhonson
• RE: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: Willem Nabuurs
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: suthen
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: de LUCY / MARMION / CAUNTELO
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: taf
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Recent trash
  • From: Dantemortem
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: lmahler
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon)
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Haringel: a St George ancestry for the Draxes
  • From: mjcar
• The Giffords' real estate at Saco, Maine
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: taf
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: harv2 . lawref
• Re: the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon)
  • From: taf
• Anabaptist Rev. Mr. Miles, gone for New England
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: wjhonson
• Magna Carta Ancestry: addition: Calverley/Drax
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Spencer Family by Charles Spencer, published 1999 by the Penguin Group
  • From: mjcar
• Re: The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: mjcar
• Recent trash
  • From: mjcar
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: harv2 . lawref
• the parentage of Ida of Lorraine (mother of Godfrey of Bouillon)
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: WJhonson
• de LUCY / MARMION / CAUNTELO
  • From: rainbow.
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: taf
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• COPYRIGHT LAW: WAS Re: The Longespée parentage...
  • From: Bill Arnold
• The Lords of Papworth St Agnes, 1086 - 1445
  • From: Hickory
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Renia
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• SPADES AND BLADES: WAS Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Trevanion of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Renia
• Re: Trevanion of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trevanion of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Trevanion of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Grateful acknowledgements
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I
  • From: wjhonson
• Sir Thomas Smith, master of requests to James I
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• The Spencer Family by Charles Spencer, published 1999 by the Penguin Group
  • From: Michael form NZ
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Sir Robert le Vavasour of Shipley
  • From: John Watson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Renia
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: Huntly Gordons
  • From: pajunkin
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Huntly Gordons
  • From: pajunkin
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: American gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne)
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle
  • From: Merilyn Pedrick
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Leticia Cluff
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Huntly Gordons
  • From: James Dempster
• Re: Huntly Gordons
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: nFS: New Family Search and Evidence Hierarchy in Combining Names
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: nFS: New Family Search and Evidence Hierarchy in Combining Names
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Huntly Gordons
  • From: pajunkin
• nFS: New Family Search and Evidence Hierarchy in Combining Names
  • From: vctinney@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Correction to "Plantagenet Descent: Edward I to Symmes of Barnsley"
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Correction to "Plantagenet Descent: Edward I to Symmes of Barnsley"
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Denis Beauregard
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Renia
• Trevanion of Cornwall
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• "Wainia" --"Waima": an unusual given name?
  • From: dunsland@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: lmahler
• Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn
  • From: John Watson
• Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn
  • From: John Watson
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: EARLY AMERICAN HISTORY: WAS Re: Chief Illiniwek
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: Huntly Gordons
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn
  • From: taf
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn
  • From: John Watson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• EARLY AMERICAN HISTORY: WAS Re: Chief Illiniwek
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: Renia
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: taf
• Re: Sinclair of Rosslyn
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: taf
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: taf
• Re: Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Rev Robert Peck of Higham, 9 steps to Richard Cecil
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk
  • From: Renia
• Re: counts of aalst/alost
  • From: Renia
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Renia
• Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Seal of Ida de Oddingseles (died 1325), wife of Roger de Herdeburgh and John de Clinton
  • From: Ian Wallace
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: Any royal lines for Philippa (Prest) Leigh, mother of Lucretia (Leigh) Bonython?
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Descents From Multiple Mediaeval Siblings
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG)
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG)
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Huntly Gordons
  • From: pajunkin
• Re: 500-Year Old Map Of *America* A Puzzle
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: WJhonson
• Any royal lines for Philippa (Prest) Leigh, mother of Lucretia (Leigh) Bonython?
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG)
  • From: rmm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: taf
• Re: 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• 500-year old map of *America* a puzzle
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: counts of Aalst/Alost
  • From: Louise
• Re: counts of Aalst/Alost
  • From: John Watson
• counts of Aalst/Alost
  • From: Louise
• RE: counts of aalst/alost
  • From: Willem Nabuurs
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: counts of aalst/alost
  • From: John Watson
• The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: M.Sjostrom
• counts of aalst/alost
  • From: Louise
• Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Matrilineal Descents
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne)
  • From: Bill Arnold
• OT: another set of five siblings (was Re: Next TAG)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne)
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk
  • From: wjhonson
• Sinclair of Rosslyn
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: viridmontane
• Re: Test / I did, PA
  • From: Dolores C. Phifer
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Renia Test
  • From: pschwarz3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk
  • From: Renia
• Re: Test
  • From: Renia
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk
  • From: Tim
• RE: Test
  • From: fcoache
• Re: Test
  • From: pj.evans
• Test
  • From: Renia
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield [REVISED POST]
  • From: taf
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: taf
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Kay Allen
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne)
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: fchal
• Re: Maryland gateways (was re: descents from Charlemagne)
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk
  • From: Renia
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Mary Tudor, Queen of France and Duchess of Suffolk
  • From: Rose
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: david11000carca
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Ian Wood's Book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée Parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & Lichfield
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Matrilineal Descents
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: D. Spencer Hines
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bis h...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• The medieval Burley family of Shropshire and Herefordshire
  • From: Hickory
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: fw matrilineal descents
  • From: Christopher Ingham
• Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: taf
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Ian Wood's book, The Merovingian Kingdoms, 450-751
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: The Longespée parentage of Roger de Meulan, Bishop of Coventry & L:ichfield
  • From: taf
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: John Peck - Robert Peck
  • From: Renia
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: gryphon801@xxxxxxx
• Re: Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Clovis to Christopher Branch?
  • From: gro
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE: Will of Henry Peck 1525
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Lake and Leake
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Suffolk
  • From: Renia
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: lostcooper
• fw matrilineal descents
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Next TAG
  • From: alden@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: James Dow Allen
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: Roger LeBlanc
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: crusaders
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: WJhonson
• RE: crusaders
  • From: Bob Turcott
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Mauger de Carteret
  • From: PALarge
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: taf
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: taf
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Belton, Yorkshire
  • From: Renia
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: Jwc1870
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Peck in Visitation of Norfolk
  • From: Renia
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: Peter Stewart
• Re: Mauger de Carteret
  • From: taf
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE - Belton, Yorkshire
  • From: Renia
• Concerning the de Driby post
  • From: Hickory
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Renia
• The de Driby family of Lincolnshire--a simple summary
  • From: Hickory
• Mauger de Carteret
  • From: PALarge
• PECK Family from SAMPFORD HALL ESSEX
  • From: cathy carley
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: lmahler
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: John P. Ravilious
• Re: A Possible descent from Dracula
  • From: CHRIS8REGIS
• Re: Next TAG
  • From: AdrianBnjmBurke
• Re: Tancred de Hauteville, and 'Muriel, the sister of Richard princeps'
  • From: Roger LeBlanc
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: taf
• Re: Next TAG
  • From: jonmeltzer@xxxxxxxxx
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: taf
• Re: Next TAG
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Next TAG
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Next TAG
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: John Brandon
• Next TAG
  • From: amgen
• Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: taf
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington....Maybe-Maybe NOT!!
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington...
  • From: butlergrt
• Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse
  • From: pierre_aronax@xxxxxxxxxxx
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic]
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: taf
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Douglas Richardson
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington...
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington....Maybe-Maybe NOT!!
  • From: butlergrt
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: WJhonson
• Re: Latin form Alphonso versus Alphonse/Alfonse
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: lmahler
• Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic]
  • From: Doug McDonald
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Renia
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: taf
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic]
  • From: Francisco Tavares de Almeida
• Descents From Charlemagne
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: A Possible descent from Dracula
  • From: Francisco Tavares de Almeida
• Re: Anne Scrope in stereo
  • From: Derek Howard
• Re: Margaret Butler of Tighes Cuckfield Sussex Ancestor of George Washington....Maybe-Maybe NOT!!
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Sir Thomas More's mother
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: taf
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: taf
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: John Watson
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: PECK DESCENT FROM CHARLEMAGNE
  • From: Bill Arnold
• Re: Anne Scrope in stereo
  • From: John Watson
• Re: Latin form Alphonso [sic]
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: A Possible descent from Dracula
  • From: lostcooper
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Nathaniel Taylor
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: lmahler
• Anne Scrope in stereo
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: John Brandon
• Re: Robert Guiscard Hauteville
  • From: wjhonson
• Re: Gramma's AT
  • From: Merilyn Pedrick
• Re: Descents From Charlemange
  • From: wjhonson