Re: Middleton pedigree, 1100-1600: Leeke and Peck

Much thanks for the interest, Will.

I do not recall saying that John Peck was "of Beccles" and if I did
consider it withdrawn. Truly, for my proposed pedigree of gateway
ancestor to America Joseph Peck, I have no interest in John Peck except
as he illuminates the pedigree. He has been an instrument of much
confusion online in many alleged pedigrees of Joseph, 1587.

Nor do I ever recall saying that Henry Peck was his "son and heir."
I do not know where you are reading that and if I did consider
it withdrawn, as well. John Peck who married the dau. of Anne
was the primogeniture son of his father and most visitations
I have seen list him as son and heir. I believe I said that because
of the English history with laws of primogeniture, it seemed to
me that was why he, the eldest son, referenced himself and four
sisters to the Visitation requests. There appears no doubt that
there were two sons born of the union of Richard Peck=Alice
Middleton, and the second, Henry, unnamed, except in other
sources, was apparently the father with Margery Leeke, dau.
of John Leeke, of Beccles, of Robert Peck, of Beccles, the Elder.

I will cite the full references in a later post. The ones I have
found, as I have already posted, were in the series of articles
in the American publication, NEHGSRegister in the 1930s, by
Stanhope and S. Allyn Peck, descendants of this line of Pecks.
I have already posted specifics from the series about the
Middleton segment of this proposed pedigree.

Bill

*************************************************************


--- WJhonson <wjhonson@xxxxxxx> wrote:

What is the proof that John Peck who married Jane (Joan) Anne was "of Beccles" ?
I think John was "of Wakefield".

Also what is the proof that Henry Peck was his "son and heir" as you stated ? I do not find any
Henry Peck at this point.

Thanks

Will Johnson

-------------------------------
To unsubscribe from the list, please send an email to GEN-MEDIEVAL-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx with the
word 'unsubscribe' without the quotes in the subject and the body of the message



__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Middleton pedigree, 1100-1600: Leeke and Peck and Waters
    ... Robert Peck, the Elder, of Beccles, was the *grandson* ... that means that John Leeke's ... Margery, and son Robert. ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Middleton pedigree, 1100-1600: Leeke and Peck
    ... question and I am convinced in my read of the many pages over many years that Robert of Beccles ... was NOT the son of John and the dau. ... this article mention the previous affiliation of Robert Peck of Beccles as son of John Peck of ... John Peck is said to have had eight sons and eight ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Peck pedigree: 1400-1600: Ancestors of Robert Peck, the Elder: IDENTITY FACT 4
    ... Robert Peck, the Elder, is the son of John Peck of Wakefield, as IDENTIFIED ... in the Pedigree of Peck in the British Museum Library, published by the College of Heralds ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Middleton pedigree, 1100-1600: Leeke and Peck
    ... What is the proof that John Peck who married Jane Anne was "of Beccles"? ... I think John was "of Wakefield". ... Also what is the proof that Henry Peck was his "son and heir" as you stated? ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Peck Pedigree resolution: CHARLEMAGNE DESCENT
    ... at Beccles, Suffolk. ... of his parishioners became nonconformists and emigrated to New England ... Hmm, no mention of the three supposed sons, Joseph, Robert and Nicholas, ... In 1582 Robert Peck was the register and collector for the Archdeacon of Suffolk. ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)