Re: Will Johnson's "prestidious" database
- From: WJhonson <wjhonson@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Oct 2007 01:31:32 -0700
In a message dated 10/13/07 01:10:28 Pacific Daylight Time, royalancestry@xxxxxxx writes:
Will ~
Where do I post the corrections to your PA corrections? I have
several of them in hand to share with you. And I know you want them.
Better yet, where do we post corrections to your own database? Do you
want them posted here on the newsgroup, or set to you privately? Will
you post the corrections on a website for us to visit? That's only
fair I think.
I've already submitted the "de Botetourt" correction of your database
to you. As of tonight, here's what you're currently showing:
Botetourt, Ada of b: 1284/1325
Botetourt, Guy , Knt of Upton, Norfolk b: 1200/1248
Botetourt, Joan de b: ABT 1362 in Mendlesham, Suffolk d: AFT 1428
Botetourt, John de b: 1335/1369 in Rotherfield, Oxfordshire d: in
Rotherfield, Oxfordshire
Botetourt, John de , Knt b: ABT 1330 in Mendlesham, Suffolk d: 1377
Botetourt, John, 1st Lord b: ABT 1265 in of Mendlesham, Suffolk d: 25
Nov 1324
Botetourt, John, Lord of Webley Castle b: 1318 d: 1385
Botetourt, Joyce de b: 1320/1355
Botetourt, Joyce de b: 1335/1368 d: 12 Aug 1420
Botetourt, Joyce, Baroness , suo jure b: 1360/1386 d: 1 Jan 1406/1407
Botetourt, Katherine b: 1335/1345 d: ABT 1387
Botetourt, Otho de b: ABT 1298 in Mendlesham, Suffolk d: 1345
Botetourt, Robert of b: 1233/1300
Botetourt, Roger of b: 1233/1300
Botetourt, Thomas de b: 1284/1301 d: 1322 in D.v.p.
You have five entries out of fifteen correctly stated, the rest are
wrong. That's not very impressive, Will. None of these people were
"de Botetourt" or "of Botetourt." The name was Botetourt, with no
"de" or "of."
Also, I just visited the the front page of your database. You seem to
have misspelled two words at the top of your main index page:
"prestidious" and "descendents"
I think you mean "prestigious descendants" not "prestidious
descendents." Is that right? I can't even find prestidious in the
dictionary. Is prestidious even a word?
For those that want to visit your database, here is the weblink:
http://awt.ancestry.com/cgi-bin/igm.cgi?op=SHOW&db=wjroyals&recno=0
Your database is certainly most "prestidious," whatever that means.
Best always, Douglas Richardson, Salt Lake City, Utah >>
--------------------------------------------
Well if your idea of a "correction" is "de" or no "de", then I don't want them :)
That isn't "my database", I actually have several such, and that one happens to be an older copy, as you can note at the top where it says
"Updated: 2006-05-25"
Meaning that it was last updated 25 May 2006. It's now 13 Oct 2007.
You can go ahead and submit corrections however if you like to me or to the list
or whatever you want.
Additions would be sort of pointless as I've been adding people continuously
for about 15 months since that was posted, so it's quite likely any addition
is already in my current data.
There is no online copy of my current database by the way, since that would
probably be your next question. I think that database on AWT was my last
public update to the internet of my royals database.
Will Johnson
.
- References:
- Re: Compleete Peerage Addition: Sir Thomas Mortimer, husband of Agnes Poynings, Lady Bardolf
- From: wilson97
- Re: Compleete Peerage Addition: Sir Thomas Mortimer, husband of Agnes Poynings, Lady Bardolf
- From: Douglas Richardson
- Re: Compleete Peerage Addition: Sir Thomas Mortimer, husband of Agnes Poynings, Lady Bardolf
- From: wilson97
- Re: Compleete Peerage Addition: Sir Thomas Mortimer, husband of Agnes Poynings, Lady Bardolf
- From: WJhonson
- Will Johnson's "prestidious" database
- From: Douglas Richardson
- Re: Compleete Peerage Addition: Sir Thomas Mortimer, husband of Agnes Poynings, Lady Bardolf
- Prev by Date: Will Johnson's "prestidious" database
- Next by Date: Re: Will Johnson's "prestidious" database
- Previous by thread: Will Johnson's "prestidious" database
- Next by thread: Re: Will Johnson's "prestidious" database
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
