Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - Part 2
- From: Ye Old One <usenet@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 18:01:19 GMT
On Thu, 15 Jun 2006 17:31:04 +0000 (UTC), WJhonson@xxxxxxx enriched
this group when s/he wrote:
Further, I would suggest that Thomas, the brother of William Brenchley, since
he is never called "knt" might... possibly... be a bit younger than William
as opposed to older. Since he is granted custody of Sheen Manor in 1384, I'm
going to give him a birthrange of 1351/63
I wonder if possibly, the elder Thomas might be father to these Brenchley's?
John, William and Thomas.
Will Johnson
Strange you should suggest that, I almost added a note putting forward
the same idea. I think that to have achived the roles the younger
Thomas and William had they should have had a father of some note.
Only problem I have with it is that Thomas the elder was already doing
well in June 1328 which would make him a little on the old side by the
time Thomas the younger came along.
--
Bob.
.
- References:
- Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - Part 2
- From: WJhonson
- Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - Part 2
- Prev by Date: Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - Part 2
- Next by Date: Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - Part 2
- Previous by thread: Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - Part 2
- Next by thread: Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - Part 2
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
