Re: Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - part 1

On Wed, 14 Jun 2006 19:01:58 +0000 (UTC), WJhonson@xxxxxxx enriched
this group when s/he wrote:

In a message dated 6/14/06 11:48:52 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
WJhonson@xxxxxxx writes:

<< Second, does the fact that we see here the "see of Lincoln" mean there is
probably a relationship between this Richard de Brenchley and the "Thomas de
Brenchley" who was, in 1328, appointed, purveyor for the household of "H
bishop of
Lincoln, chancellor" ? He was appointed again by "H bishop of Lincoln the
chancellor" "until Michaelmas" on May 6 1329 >>


Is "H" = Henry Burghersh ? I'm showing that he was Bishop of Lincoln around
this time, but I don't have a list of who preceded or succeeded him to know if
there was another "H" hanging out.

Thanks
Will Johnson

http://sdrc.lib.uiowa.edu/patentrolls/e2v3/body/Edward2vol3page0559.pdf
show a Henry but no surname.

--
Bob.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - part 1
    ... Brenchley" who was, in 1328, appointed, purveyor for the household of "H ... He was appointed again by "H bishop of Lincoln the ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - part 1
    ... Grant for life, to Master Richard de Brenchesle, king's clerk, of the ... I'm not really clear here on how archdeaconry of Huntingdon was "in the ... king's gift" because of the voidance of the see of Lincoln. ... Brenchley" who was, in 1328, ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)
  • Re: Even earlier Brenchleys - part 1
    ... I'm not really clear here on how archdeaconry of Huntingdon was "in the ... king's gift" because of the voidance of the see of Lincoln. ... probably a relationship between this Richard de Brenchley and the "Thomas de ...
    (soc.genealogy.medieval)