Re: For MAR: Freville, Bury, Haselden, Hutton
- From: "Sutliff" <suthen@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2006 14:04:55 -0700
Anthony Hasilden only had a daughter Elizabeth of which I am aware. I am
wondering if this Beatrix is the erroneous daughter, also called Rose,
assigned as wife to Robert Freville, who was disproved by Eugene A. Stratton
in _Applied Genealogy_, and thus severing a Hasilden descent?
HS
<WJhonson@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:4c2.9b8b91.31b8939b@xxxxxxxxxx
In a message dated 6/7/06 12:54:04 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
starbuck95@xxxxxxxxxxx writes:
<<
http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/FH10&CISOPTR=58559&REC=8
Will of William Marshall, parson of Marston, co. Bedford, dated 16 Feb.
1558. To be buried in the chancel of the Assumption of our blessed
Lady Marston nigh unto my mother's grave. To my niece Beatrix Frevell
a cup of silver double gilt. Haselden Bury my nephew, and James Hutton
his father-in-law. Devises his house at Royston, co. Cambridge, to his
sister Jane Haselden. etc. >>
I believe this Jane Hasilden must be the widow of Anthony Hasilden son of
John Hasilden and Elizabeth Cheney
Anthony died bef 1 Jun 1527 on which date his will was proved.
He left at least two daughters Elizabeth (Hasilden) Bury wife of Richard
Bury
of Hengrange
and
Beatrix (Hasilden) Freville, wife of Robert Freville
So it seems that Jane, wife of Anthony Hasilden must be a Jane Marshall.
Will Johnson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: For MAR: Freville, Bury, Haselden, Hutton
- From: mjcar
- Re: For MAR: Freville, Bury, Haselden, Hutton
- References:
- Re: For MAR: Freville, Bury, Haselden, Hutton
- From: WJhonson
- Re: For MAR: Freville, Bury, Haselden, Hutton
- Prev by Date: Re: Robert de Lathom 1254-1302 m. Katherine de Knowseligh 1261-?
- Next by Date: Will of Maud, Countess of Arundel, proved in 1436
- Previous by thread: Re: For MAR: Freville, Bury, Haselden, Hutton
- Next by thread: Re: For MAR: Freville, Bury, Haselden, Hutton
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|